Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kristina Kayser & Lowell Weiner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$38kHealth$18kArts & Culture$16kFood & Nutrition$16kCommunity Improvement$11kEnvironment$11kAnimals$9kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$528k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOOL OF AMERICAN MUSIC$6,900
MICHIANNA HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY$1,030
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$1,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF COBB COUNTY$1,000
NEIGHBOR BY NEIGHBOR$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN$1,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$1,000
WNIT PUBLIC TV MICHIANA$480
ACORN THEATER$213
NEW BUFFALO LIBRARY$115
NEW BUFFALO RR MUSEUM$103
LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $34 → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF COBB COUNTY: $1k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF COBB COUNTY: $1k → 9%CHILDRENS RESTORATION NETWORK: $1k → 13%NEIGHBOR BY NEIGHBOR: $1k → 15%NEIGHBOR BY NEIGHBOR: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 20 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$118k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
0%

Still filing today

60%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
    6× · 2018–2023 · $11k · revenue +252%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $10k · revenue +85%
  • CH
    CORNER HEALTH CENTER
    6× · 2018–2023 · $7k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • NB
    NEW BUFFALO SERVICE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
3
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
4
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Kitchen

Food service for the poor, economically disadvantaged, and elderly.

Food & Nutrition
6
Circle of Concern

Circle of concern feeds the hungry and provides assistance to low-income families living in west st. louis county.

Human Services
7
Cooperstown Food Pantry Inc

The mission of the cooperstown food pantry is to address issues of poverty and hunger in otsego county.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corner Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Grand Circle Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WCC FOUNDATION STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP: $28,800 · OtherWCC FOUNDATION STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPFOOD GATHERERS: $10,000 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $9,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGANCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $7,000 · OtherCORNER HEALTH CENTERCOMMON PANTRY: $6,000 · OtherCOMMON PANTRYCORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $3,500 · Other+18 more: $13,596 · Other+18 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $11,245 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACT…Neighbor by Neighbor: $2,000 · Human ServicesNeighbor by N…FAMILY PROMISE OF COBB COUNTY: $2,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMIS…Children's Restoration Network: $1,000 · Human ServicesChildren's Re…+1 more: $34 · Human ServicesSCHOOL OF AMERICAN MUSIC: $11,900 · Arts & CultureSCHOOL OF AM…PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $2,680 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROAD…+1 more: $60 · Arts & CultureCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $5,000 · EnvironmentCHIKAMING…HURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $5,000 · EnvironmentHURON RIV…CLEAN WATER FUND: $1,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN WAT…MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,330 · AnimalsDONORSCHOOSEORG: $4,960 · EducationThe Drake House Inc: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterGRAND CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$77,896Human Services$16,279Arts & Culture$14,640Environment$11,000Animals$5,330Education$4,960Housing & Shelter$3,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHOOL OF AMERICAN MUSIC: $11,900 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $11,245 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON PANTRY: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,330 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $4,960 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Drake House Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $2,680 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNeighbor by Neighbor: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF COBB COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW BUFFALO RAILROAD MUSEUM: $103 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $34 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds HURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds The Drake House Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds Neighbor by Neighbor ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF COBB COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Restoration Network ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW BUFFALO RAILROAD MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berrien Community Foundation IncMI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berrien Community Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kristina Kayser & Lowell Weiner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kristina Kayser & Lowell Weiner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kristina Kayser & Lowell Weiner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph