· Private foundation
Kozmetsky Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+3 grants · $950k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $300,000 |
| DELL MEDICAL SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN | $250,000 |
| HUNTERSEVEN FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE | $150,000 |
| FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM | $140,000 |
| HOUSING FORWARD | $140,000 |
| BIG THOUGHT | $140,000 |
| BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION DBA BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE DALLAS FDN | $135,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK | $130,000 |
| UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $125,000 |
| THE SAFE ALLIANCE | $125,000 |
| THE HUMAN IMPACT | $110,000 |
| MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMThe McCombs School of Business Foundation2× · 2020–2021 · $5.0M · revenue +24%
- DCDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $840k · revenue +123%
- NTNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK4× · 2020–2024 · $835k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- SMSouthwestern Medical Foundation for the benefit of UT SW Medical Centerone grant, 2022 · $600k
- CFCenter for Brain Healthone grant, 2020 · $250k
CURE DUCHENNEone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ark House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The McCombs School of Business Foundation ↗
- Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
- Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds St Edwards University ↗
- Who funds FRONTIERS OF FLIGHT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds TORY BURCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN AIRPOWER HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds THE 19TH NEWS ↗
- Who funds JUST COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds BIG THOUGHT ↗
- Who funds Wonders & Worries Inc ↗
- Who funds HUNTER SEVEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COMPASS ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
- Who funds AFF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE HUMAN IMPACT ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds PROMISE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Ark House Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Texas 2036 ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Moody Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Meadows Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Addy Foundation · The Hoglund Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kozmetsky Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.