Skip to content
Korban International Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Korban International Inc

The purpose of the organization is to assist in obtaining and providing those individuals in financial need, especially the needy, the basic living necessities.

$37k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$332kInternational$110kHuman Services$86kHealth$15kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE PURSE$20,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE INT'L RELIEF$10,000
FAR REACHING MINISTRY$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DESIRING GOD: $10k → 11%NAVIGATORS: $15k → 12%FAR REACHING MINISTRY: $7k → 11%PIONEER BIBLE TRANSLATORS: $60k → 14%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $20k → 16%GOD'S BOATHOUSE OF VOLUSIA: $15k → 12%ONE PURSE: $27k → 13%CHURCH AT WHISTLING PINES: $10k → 16%ONE MORE CHILD: $15k → 16%PILOTS FOR CHRIST: $10k → 13%FRESH HOPE MINISTRIES: $44k → 23%SAMARITAN'S PURSE INT'L RELIEF: $60k → 21%ONE PURSE: $20k → 13%SAMARITAN'S PURSE INT'L RELIEF: $10k → 21%SAMARITAN'S VILLAGE: $15k → 13%ONE PURSE: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
CA
AR
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$202k · 3 repeat orgs$382k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
15

Total granted

$202k
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    ASHA MISSION SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $76k · revenue -14%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $70k · revenue +40%
  • OP
    ONE PURSE
    3× · 2019–2023 · $56k · revenue +409%

Funded once

  • BG
    BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $64k
  • PB
    Pioneer Bible Translators
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +4%
  • TG
    THE GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $44k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
2
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
3
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
4
Far Reaching Ministries Aviation Inc

Far Reaching Ministries Aviation, Inc. is dedicated to fulfilling the Great Commission given in Matthew 28:19-20: "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the…

International
5
Destiny Ministries International Inc

Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible

Religion
6
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
7
Bibles and Bikes
Youth Development
8
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
9
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
10
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
11
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
12
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bible Study Fellowship; the most unlike its peers is God's Bathhouse of Volusia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASHA MISSION SOCIETY INC: $75,500 · ReligionASHA MISSION SOCIETY INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $70,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEPioneer Bible Translators: $60,000 · ReligionPioneer Bible TranslatorsBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $20,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIPDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $63,999 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATI…THE GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $44,000 · OtherTHE GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INCSAMARITAN'S VILLAGE: $15,000 · OtherSAMARITAN'S VILLAGETHE NAVIGATORS: $15,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSONE MORE CHILD FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherONE MORE CHILD FOUNDATION INCMISCELLANEOUS: $10,168 · OtherMISCELLANEOUSPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $10,000 · OtherPILOTS FOR CHRIST INCCHURCH AT WHISTLING PINES: $10,000 · OtherCHURCH AT WHISTLING PINESONE PURSE: $56,000 · InternationalONE PURSERAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · InternationalRAFIKI FOUNDATION I…Far Reaching Ministries: $7,000 · InternationalFar Reaching Minist…Hope for LaGonave Inc: $32,000 · Human ServicesHope for …Unlikely Heroes Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesUnlikely …GOD'S BATHHOUSE OF VOLUSIA: $15,000 · Health
Religion$235,500Other$183,167International$103,000Human Services$47,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHA MISSION SOCIETY INC: $75,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPioneer Bible Translators: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE PURSE: $56,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetRAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHope for LaGonave Inc: $32,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S BATHHOUSE OF VOLUSIA: $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetDESIRING GOD MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFar Reaching Ministries: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Texas Instruments Fou…Servant FoundationRaymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Korban International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Korban International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Korban International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Korban International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Korban International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home