· Private foundation
Konzen Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $384k
- $50k–250k45 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+8 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNTAIN TO SOUND GREENWAY | $650,000 |
| SEATTLE UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $507,500 |
| TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $500,000 |
| SEATTLE CHILDRENS' HOSPITAL GUILD | $395,000 |
| PLANT WITH PURPOSE | $393,460 |
| AGROS INERNATIONAL | $260,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $250,000 |
| NEW STORY | $250,000 |
| MISSION FLIGHT | $227,000 |
| NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE | $225,000 |
| WORLD VISION FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| NORTHWEST FAMILY LIFE | $200,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $180,000 |
| SOLID GROUND WASHINGTON | $175,000 |
| WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION | $175,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
65 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND2× · 2024–2025 · $600k · revenue +27%- NDNATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE4× · 2022–2025 · $350k · revenue +7%
- SGSolid Ground Washington4× · 2022–2025 · $350k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- RCRED CROSSone grant, 2021 · $280k
- AVAMERICAN VINEYARD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -12%
- MPMaris Placegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agros International and the most unlike its peers is National Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAHAI HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds AGROS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINE ↗
- Who funds NEW STORY INC ↗
- Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds MISSION FLIGHT ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds Northwest Family Life Learning And Counseling Center ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Honnold Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Forests ↗
- Who funds The More We Love ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Jubilee REACH ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STREET BUSINESS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds CHIMPANZEE SANCTUARY NORTHWEST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Garneau Nicon Family Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Moccasin Lake Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Bacon Family Foundation · Eastside Community Aid · Mark Torrance Foundation · The Foster Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Konzen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- The Parlor Room — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.