Skip to content
Kondracke Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kondracke Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$35kReligion$21kPhilanthropy$14kHealth$8kArts & Culture$4kHuman Services$2kRecreation & Sports$890Animals$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$156k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WITTENBERG UNIVERSITY$3,000
FIRST COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,750
PELOTONIA$2,743
CHILDHOOD LEAGUE$2,600
BIRDIE LIGHT$1,000
BEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
SOUTHERN OHIO PGA SECTION$271
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $35) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $35 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 14 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$68k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+11%

Still filing today

43%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P
    PELOTONIA
    3× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +217%
  • BE
    BEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $1k · revenue +33%
  • DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $502 · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • CC
    Crawford Crew Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $750 · revenue +29%
  • OA
    OAKSTONE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $650
  • WE
    Whitehall Education Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $550
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
5
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
6
Drake University

See schedule o.drake's mission is to provide an exceptional learning environment that prepares students for meaningful personal lives, professional accomplishments, and responsible global citizenship. the drake experience is distinguished…

Education
7
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Bellevue College Foundation

Bellevue college foundation brings together people and resources across the community to invest in bc students, faculty, and staff to realize their goals and dreams.

Education
10
Cdu Foundation

The purpose of this corporation is to perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of charles r. drew university of medicine and science (cdu), a california nonprofit public benefit corporation. this…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delta Gamma Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Crawford Crew Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FIRST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $21,069 · OtherTHE FIRST COMMUNITY CHURCHPELATONIA: $4,150 · OtherPELATONIAMAKE A WISH: $2,350 · OtherMAKE A WISHNATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,865 · OtherBEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,200 · Other+18 more: $4,672 · Other+18 moreTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $18,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGECHILDHOOD LEAGUE INC: $11,896 · EducationCHILDHOOD LEAGUE INCPELOTONIA: $3,105 · EducationPELOTONIA+4 more: $1,452 · EducationBEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13,000 · PhilanthropyBEXLEY COMMUNITY F…Crawford Crew Foundation: $750 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $500 · PhilanthropyBirdieLight: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $126 · HealthCHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC: $100 · HealthCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $100 · Arts & CultureMOTTS MILITARY MUSEUM INC: $50 · Arts & CultureDUBLIN FOOD PANTRY: $100 · Food & NutritionBRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $35 · Human Services
Other$35,306Education$34,953Philanthropy$14,250Health$1,576Arts & Culture$150Food & Nutrition$100Human Services$35

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $18,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDHOOD LEAGUE INC: $11,896 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPELOTONIA: $3,105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $502 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUBLIN FOOD PANTRY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTTS MILITARY MUSEUM INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEWAY ACADEMY: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BEXLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds BEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BirdieLight ↗
  • Who funds Crawford Crew Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Whitehall Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER COLUMBUS ↗
  • Who funds DUBLIN FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL HAVEN SCHLEIFER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds MOTTS MILITARY MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Ohio Child Care Resou…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Columbus FoundationOH25.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral Association · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kondracke Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kondracke Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Chapel Haven Schleifer Center Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kondracke Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home