Skip to content
Kolodesh Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kolodesh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$285k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$534kEducation$435kReligion$273kRecreation & Sports$62kYouth Development$38kPhilanthropy$25kMembership Benefit$25kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $240k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$100,000
PINK RIBBON GIRLS$75,000
KETTERING HEALTH FOUNDATION$65,324
CHABAD OF GREATER DAYTON$25,000
NE'EMAN FOUNDATION USA$7,500
CDT PARENT ASSOCIATION$5,500
BOCA RATON SYNAGOGUE$5,000
OAKWOOD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$1,050
BEAVERCREEK CITY SCHOOLS$200
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$100
THE GLENN AT ST JOSEPH$100
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$100
THE DAYTON FOUNDATION$100
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOSPICE OF DAYTON: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
UT
MD
TN
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 24 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
43

Total granted

$1.1M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+13%

Still filing today

42%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $203k · revenue +438%
  • KM
    KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +23%
  • TF
    THE FINNEYTOWN SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • KM
    KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue +15%
  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +30%
  • JC
    JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dayton Children's Hospital Foundation

Dayton children's hospital foundation (the foundation) exists solely to benefit dayton children's hospital, dayton, ohio (dch), and to assist dch in performing its charitable mission.

Health
2
Dayton Osteopathic Hospital

Our mission is to live god's love by promoting and restoring health.

Health
3
Dayton Children's Hospital

The relentless pursuit of optimal health for every child within our reach.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Dayton Clinical Oncology Program Inc

To reduce cancer incidence and mortality through improved treatment and prevention by offering national, state-of-the-art cancer research to local communities.

Health
6
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
7
The Christ Hospital Foundation

The mission of the christ hospital foundation ('tch fdn') is to support the mission of the christ hospital ('tch'). tch's mission is to improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the…

Health
8
Fox Chase Cancer Center Foundation

To prevail over cancer, marshaling heart and mind in bold scientific discovery, pioneering prevention and compassionate care.

Health
9
Hospice of Fayette County Inc

Provide home or nursing home care for terminally ill patients and their families. provided education & support to fayette county and surrounding communities about qualify of life issues.

—
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Good Samaritan Foundation - Dayton

Inspire philanthropy to enhance the health and well-being of the greater dayton communities and the healthcare professionals who care for them.

—
12
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dayton Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Glen at St Joseph. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
28/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $405,000 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYCHABAD OF GREATER DAYTON INC: $261,596 · OtherCHABAD OF GREATER DAYTON INCASIAN ARTS CENTER: $37,350 · Other+44 more: $46,150 · Other+44 morePINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $203,101 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INCKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 · HealthKETTERING MEDICAL CENTERKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,324 · HealthKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $100,000 · HealthMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL+7 more: $2,820 · HealthTHE FINNEYTOWN SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationCDT PARENT ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · Education+2 more: $300 · EducationDAYTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $16,500 · Recreation & SportsPittsburgh Amateur Hockey Association Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsDAYTON CLASSICS BASEBALL CLUB INC: $6,500 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $650 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON: $25,000 · Membership BenefitJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC: $19,725 · Philanthropy+3 more: $300 · PhilanthropyNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $7,500 · International+2 more: $200 · International
Other$750,096Health$531,245Education$37,300Recreation & Sports$33,650Membership Benefit$25,000Philanthropy$20,025International$7,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $203,101 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,324 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN ARTS CENTER: $37,350 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetJEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON: $25,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE FINNEYTOWN SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC: $19,725 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCDT PARENT ASSOCIATION: $17,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetDAYTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $16,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPittsburgh Amateur Hockey Association Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDAYTON CLASSICS BASEBALL CLUB INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVANDALIA BUTLER OPTIMIST FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASSANOS CARES FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKETTERING HOLIDAY AT HOME: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dayton Metro Library Foundation: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaiges Princess Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TENUFA BAKEHILA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAYTON FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
  • Who funds THE FINNEYTOWN SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DAYTON INC ↗
  • Who funds CDT PARENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Pittsburgh Amateur Hockey Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CLASSICS BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VANDALIA BUTLER OPTIMIST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHURS ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CASSANOS CARES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WEST CARROLLTON RECREATIONAL ASSOCIATON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Levin Family Foundati…The Berry Family Foun…Mathile Family Founda…Dayton Foundation Plu…The Greater Cincinnat…Stuart Rose Family Fo…Dupps Company Charita…Assurant FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
The Dayton FoundationOH26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Levin Family Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Stuart Rose Family Foundation Stuart Rose · Dupps Company Charitable Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kolodesh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kolodesh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kolodesh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home