Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kolibri Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
76
Grants FY2024still arriving
26
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$3.9MPhilanthropy$2.5MHealth$1.7MCrime & Legal$1.2MEnvironment$1.0MHuman Services$934kReligion$620kArts & Culture$589kOther$0
02FY2024 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $823k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$25,000
Median grant
26
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
M4BL$500,000
TRANS JUSTICE FUNDING PROJECT$250,000
NQTTCN$250,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT$100,000
SOUTHERN POWER FUND$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
LATINX THERAPIST ACTION NETWORK$100,000
FATHERS 4 JUSTICE$100,000
ADALAH JUSTICE PROJECT$100,000
DRINKING GOURD REPARATIONS SUMMER$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
THE SMILE TRUST$100,000
COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR SAFE SPACES$75,000
QUEER CRESCENT$75,000
COLECTIVA FEMINISTA EN CONSTRUCCION$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $715k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%OPERATION RESTORATION: $250k → 9%NEW HOPE COMMUNITY: $50k → 16%THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY (TKO): $200k → 33%OUR SPOT KC: $10k → 16%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $75k → 10%THE SMILE TRUST: $100k → 15%EQUITY & TRANSFORMATION: $20k → 14%HIPS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Kolibri Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kolibri Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 24 repeat orgs$9.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
98

Total granted

$5.1M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    Healing to Action
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +64%
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200k · revenue +156%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MB
    Medicine Bowl Giving Circle Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $614k · revenue -48% · 40% of their budget
  • Alliance for Global Justice Corp
    one grant, 2020 · $575k · revenue -25%
  • NI
    NAT'L INST PEER SUPPORT HARRIET'S WILDEST DREAMS
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
2
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
5
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
6
LexCollective

LexCollective is a not-for-profit organization that addresses the most extreme forms of social, racial, economic, and environmental injustices around the world, such as mass atrocities, human trafficking, environmental destruction, and…

International
7
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
8
New Disabled South Rising Inc

New Disabled South Rising is the advocacy arm of New Disabled South focusing on poverty and care, criminalization and democracy.

Civil Rights
9
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
10
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture
11
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
12
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brava Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/77
Grantees still filing
34/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOVEMENT FOR BLACK LIVES: $1,000,000 · OtherMOVEMENT FOR BLACK LIVESFUNDACION DE MUJERES: $525,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $525,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherM4BL: $500,000 · Other+155 more: $9,485,818 · Other+155 moreMedicine Bowl Giving Circle Inc: $614,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $200,000 · Environment+2 more: $15,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $710,000 · EducationTHE RUCKUS SOCIETY: $100,000 · EducationROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropySolidaire Network Inc: $58,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell Fund: $50,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,200 · PhilanthropyOPERATION RESTORATION: $250,000 · Human ServicesTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE SMILE TRUST: $100,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $75,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE COMMUNITY INC: $50,000 · Human Services+6 more: $80,358 · Human ServicesAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $575,000 · InternationalCenter for Third World Organizing: $100,000 · InternationalHEALING TOGETHER: $75,000 · InternationalCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $505,000 · Community ImprovementSOULFORCE INC: $75,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$12,535,818Environment$829,000Education$810,000Philanthropy$763,200Human Services$755,358International$750,000Community Improvement$590,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $710,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMedicine Bowl Giving Circle Inc: $614,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $575,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $505,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION: $250,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealing to Action: $225,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetIntransitive TM Inc: $225,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC: $225,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST: $200,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetStrippers United Inc: $150,000 over 2y, 76% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $130,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFamily Tree Inc: $125,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetOHIO VOICE: $125,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPoder in Action: $105,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetThe Decarceration Collective: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE RUCKUS SOCIETY: $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SMILE TRUST: $100,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetRESIST INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAPITAL TEA INC: $100,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT: $100,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetHEALING TOGETHER: $75,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION: $75,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSOULFORCE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCOLLECTIVE ACTION FOR SAFE SPACES: $75,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHARLESTON GOOD INC: $75,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSolidaire Network Inc: $58,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL ACTION PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEW HOPE COMMUNITY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGroundswell Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood Funders Group: $33,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIDAHO COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJustice Committee Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Medicine Bowl Giving Circle Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION RESTORATION ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Healing to Action ↗
  • Who funds Intransitive TM Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Strippers United Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASTRAEA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Tree Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO VOICE ↗
  • Who funds Poder in Action ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Borealis PhilanthropyMN51.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Groundswell Fund · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Tides Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · New Venture Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Solidaire Network Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kolibri Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kolibri Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kolibri Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kolibri Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 190 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kolibri’s filings →

More from the funding graph