· Private foundation
Kohli Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEOMED FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| VEDIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $2,001 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $1,175 |
| SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED | $1,100 |
| SLN TEMPLE OF NEO | $801 |
| INDIA ASSOCIATION OF YOUNGSTOWN | $630 |
| AFP | $560 |
| HINDU TEMPLE | $253 |
| RESCUE MISSION MAHONING VALLEY | $200 |
| AAPI | $150 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100 |
| VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS | $50 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $350) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 55% of Kohli Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 38% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC3× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +181%
- RMRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +31%
- NONORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +157%
Funded once
- MHMERCY HOSPITAL SCHOOL OF NURSINGone grant, 2017 · $3k
- MCMAHONING COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY AUXone grant, 2019 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $901
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the health of those we serve.
To improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients withvascular disease by promoting clinical and basic research; providingcontinuing education; developing post-graduate training; advocating onbehalf of members; promoting the…
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
University hospitals (the system) is guided by its mission, "to heal. to teach. to discover."
Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…
Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.
Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.
The purpose of the society is to support the field of vascular medicine and biology and to maintain the highest standards of practice, research, education, and exchange of scientific information. a regular meeting, which sponsors education…
The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.
University hospitals (the system) is guided by its mission "to heal. to teach. to discover."
Acute care hospital facility delivering quality services to our patients and the communities we serve.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Enchanted Peach Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is A Scott Crossfield Elementary School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗
- Who funds ENCHANTED PEACH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A Scott Crossfield Elementary School PTO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEADACHE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUR COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE CHARITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · The Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity Foundation · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · Farmers Charitable Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Premier Bank Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kohli Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.