Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kohlheim Family Fdn Inc - Agy

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$145kHousing & Shelter$85kHealth$80kFood & Nutrition$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kCrime & Legal$35kHuman Services$28kEnvironment$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
READING PARTNERS$10,000
ONE-EIGHTY PLACE$10,000
PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES$10,000
CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND OF SOUTH CAROLINA$10,000
LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC$10,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$10,000
ORTON GILLINGHAM CENTER OF CHARLESTON$5,000
LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS LOWCOUNTRY CHAPTER: $10k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$423k · 11 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$423k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-13%

Still filing today

82%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    One-Eighty Place
    6× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +63%
  • MU
    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +377%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • TC
    THE CHARLESTON PROMISE NEIGHORHOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND OF THE SOUTH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
South Carolina Legal Services

South carolina legal services is a statewide law firm that provides civil legal services to protect the rights and represent the interests of low income south carolinians.

Crime & Legal
3
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
4
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
5
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
6
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
7
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
8
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

—
9
Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc

The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.

Food & Nutrition
10
Robert a Toigo Foundation

Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.

Education
11
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reading Partners; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

READING PARTNERS: $100,000 · OtherREADING PARTNERSLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCPORTER-GAUD FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherPORTER-GAUD FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE: $15,000 · OtherTHE CHARLESTON PROMISE NEIGHORHOOD: $15,000 · Other+13 more: $95,000 · Other+13 moreMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $60,034 · HealthMEDICAL UNIVE…Active Minds Inc: $10,000 · HealthActive Minds …One-Eighty Place: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterOne-Eighty Pl…PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC: $35,000 · Crime & LegalTURN90: $10,000 · Crime & LegalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $10,000 · Human ServicesMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMETANOIA: $15,000 · Community Improvement
Other$325,000Health$70,034Housing & Shelter$70,000Crime & Legal$45,000Human Services$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne-Eighty Place: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $60,034 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC: $35,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPORTER-GAUD FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETANOIA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTURN90: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING AND LENDING OUTREACH SUPPORT: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLowcountry Literacy Project: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Joanna Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Magnolia Plantation Foundation · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Trident United Way · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kohlheim Family Fdn Inc - Agy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kohlheim Family Fdn Inc - Agy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kohlheim Family Fdn Inc - Agy’s filings →

More from the funding graph