Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Koenig Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$69kEducation$59kHealth$58kPhilanthropy$47kArts & Culture$44kCrime & Legal$33kAnimals$25kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,000
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM & EDUCATION CENTER$7,500
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$5,800
CITY YEAR CHICAGO$5,000
CHICAGO KENT COLLEGE OF LAW$2,500
APRAXIA VOICE$2,500
PEGGY NOTEBAERT NATURE MUSEUM$2,500
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$2,500
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$2,500
HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY$1,000
JCFS CHICAGO$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $1k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $1k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $1k → 14%A Better Chicago: $190 → 14%EX-CONS FOR COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL CHANGE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$279k · 28 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
36

Total granted

$279k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+12%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +13%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +15%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOPE CHICAGO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • JA
    JAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -18%
  • NM
    Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Groupgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
2
Northern Illinois University Foundation

The niu foundation's mission is to energize and connect the private sector with the niu community to secure and steward resources that support the future and growth of niu.

Education
3
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Students Run Chicago
Health
6
The Chicago Scholars Foundation

Chicago scholars is transforming the leadership landscape of our city by resolving the fundamental barriers to success for academically driven, first generation college students from under-resourced communities.

Education
7
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

9
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
10
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
12
Hillels of Illinois Endowment Foundation

The foundation was established exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, a not-for-profit organization.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allendale Association and the most unlike its peers is The Host Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…School Parent OrganizationsSchool District FoundationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr15%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr18%36%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr14%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr15%10%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr18%11%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr14%38%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/48
the rest of the field
14%
11,571/82,411

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
30/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law — $30,000 · OtherIIT Chicago-Kent College of LawHOPE CHICAGO INC — $25,000 · OtherHOPE CHICAGO INCFriends of the Israel Defense Force — $22,100 · OtherFriends of the Israel Defense ForceALLENDALE ASSOCIATION — $12,500 · OtherALLENDALE ASSOCIATIONKESHET — $10,750 · OtherKESHETIndividual grant recipient — $9,750 · OtherHIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY — $8,500 · OtherCITY YEAR INC — $8,000 · OtherFestival of Children Foundation — $10,000 · Other+35 more — $57,940 · Other+35 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $28,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIO…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $17,800 · InternationalFRIENDS OF T…+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $45,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITE…+2 more — $1,750 · PhilanthropyHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $26,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST ME…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe United S…UNITING VOICES — $5,000 · Arts & CultureUNITING VOIC…THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $2,750 · Arts & CultureTHE CHICAGO …Indiana University Foundation — $15,000 · EducationMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION — $3,500 · EducationGPF FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationIllinois Institute of Technology — $2,500 · EducationJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $2,500 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $2,000 · Education+4 more — $2,000 · EducationNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $15,000 · HealthNorthwestern Memorial HealthCare Group — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $450 · HealthJAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · Animals
Other$194,540International$46,800Philanthropy$46,750Arts & Culture$44,250Education$30,500Health$25,450Animals$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $26,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJAMES A BRENNAN MEMORIAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $17,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLENDALE ASSOCIATION — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET — $10,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFestival of Children Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern Memorial HealthCare Group — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINVEST IN KIDS — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITING VOICES — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGPF FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESSE WHITE FOUNDATION LTD — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Cubs Charities — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOST FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION AT INDIANA UNIVERSITY INC — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVictories Of The Heart NFP — $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCAL'S ALL-STAR ANGEL FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids Above All Illinois — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cara Program — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHFS CHICAGO SCHOLARS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL18.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Sam I Am Foundation · The Kadens Family Foundation · The Grainger Foundation Inc · Kovler Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Koenig Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Koenig Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Koenig Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph