Skip to content

· Private foundation

KNU For Kids Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$541k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7MYouth Development$840kArts & Culture$307kHuman Services$241kHousing & Shelter$150kCivil Rights$120kEducation$6kRecreation & Sports$3k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $390k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$50,000
Stepping Stones of the Roaring Fork$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOU$50,000
FAMILIES FORWARD$40,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB LA HARBOR$40,000
A WAY OUT$40,000
ASPEN YOUTH CENTER$35,000
J F SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING$35,000
WINDWALKERS$30,000
Assistance League of San Pedro Sout$30,000
CENTER ON COLFAX$30,000
HOPE HOUSE COLORADO$30,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP$20,000
THE WOODEN FLOOR$20,000
ASPEN HOPE CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WINDWALKERS: $60k → 6%HOPE HOUSE COLORADO: $30k → 7%HOPE HOUSE COLORADO: $30k → 7%HOPE HOUSE COLORADO: $20k → 7%HOPE HOUSE COLORADO: $20k → 7%WINDWALKERS: $50k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $30k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $30k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $30k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $25k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $20k → 6%WINDWALKERS: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of KNU For Kids Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 46%.

KNU For Kids Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 18 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$3.3M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+84%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $390k · revenue +38%
  • SS
    STEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $311k · revenue +145%
  • AH
    ASPEN HOPE CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $310k · revenue +420%

Funded once

  • AV
    ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Area Youth Services

To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.

Human Services
2
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
3
Arapahoe County Early Childhood Council Inc

Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.

Education
4
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
5
Denver Youth Program

Youth counseling and mentoring.

Youth Development
6
The Guidance Center

The guidance center provides comprehensive mental health treatment to our community's most disadvantaged children and their families struggling with mental illness and abuse, leading them toward a positive and productive future.

Health
7
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
8
Denver Children's Advocacy Center

Dcac works to improve the lives of children traumatized by sexual abuse, neglect and violence-as well as those who are at high-risk with prevention, education, and direct services. our mission is to prevent abuse strengthen families…

Employment
9
Junior Achievement-Rocky Mountain Inc

Junior achievement - rocky mountain, inc. (ja) is critical for inspiring and preparing young people to own their economic success. in partnership with business and educators, ja immerses students in disruptive, real-world experiences,…

International
10
Youth Progress Association

Youth progress is a nonprofit organization that is licensed as a child caring agency (cca) to serve youth ages 12-25 in the custody of the oregon youth authority (oya) or the oregon department of human services (dhs). youth progress uses…

Health
11
Adoption Options

Adoption options is a non-profit,colorado corporation, dedicated to providing the state of colorado with a range of private, non-secretarian child placement services.

Human Services
12
Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc

The adaptive sports center enriches the lives of people with disabilities and other specific needs through exceptional outdoor adventures. the successful programs the asc provides are inclusive to families and friends, empower our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wooden Floor for Youth Movement; the most unlike its peers is Assistance League of San Pedro-South Bay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $390,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOO…ASPEN HOPE CENTER: $310,000 · HealthASPEN HOPE CENTERA Way Out Inc: $220,000 · HealthA Way Out IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $50,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $230,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODFAMILIES FORWARD: $150,000 · OtherFAMILIES FORWARDAssistance League of San Pedro-South Bay: $141,000 · OtherAssistance League of San …GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO: $120,000 · OtherGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TR…RICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER: $95,000 · OtherRICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER+2 more: $16,420 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR: $234,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…ASPEN YOUTH CENTER: $185,000 · Youth DevelopmentASPEN YOUTH CE…OPERATION JUMP START: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentWINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND: $260,000 · Human ServicesWINDWALKERS …HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $100,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE O…STEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK VALLEY: $310,500 · Public BenefitSTEPPING S…CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $160,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER THE…THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $147,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOODEN…JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $200,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$970,000Other$752,420Youth Development$434,000Human Services$360,000Public Benefit$310,500Arts & Culture$307,000Recreation & Sports$203,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $390,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK VALLEY: $310,500 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetASPEN HOPE CENTER: $310,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetWINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND: $260,000 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR: $234,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetA Way Out Inc: $220,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $200,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetASPEN YOUTH CENTER: $185,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD: $150,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $147,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetAssistance League of San Pedro-South Bay: $141,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO: $120,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $100,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION JUMP START: $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES OF THE ROARING FORK VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds A Way Out Inc ↗
  • Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of San Pedro-South Bay ↗
  • Who funds GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION JUMP START ↗
  • Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Aspen Community Foundation · The Thrift Shop · The Thendara Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Zanin Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization KNU For Kids Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from KNU For Kids Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on KNU For Kids’ filings →

    More from the funding graph