Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Knorr-Bremse Global Care North America Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$634k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$769kYouth Development$526kArts & Culture$460kEmployment$242kPublic Safety & Disaster$207kInternational$157kFood & Nutrition$130kScience & Tech$78kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$87,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$165
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUNDACION BENDIX AC$107,350
FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS$100,000
AMANDLA INC$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WESTMINSTER$87,600
BOYS HOPE AND GIRLS HOPE$80,000
CENTER FOR ARTS - INSPIRED LEARNING$80,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO$79,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving83% of grant dollars ($2.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($467k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%children's home of jefferson county: $15k → 14%watertown urban mission inc: $15k → 14%BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $80k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
KY
MD
DC

Beyond the US17% of all-years giving ($467k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$467k · 5 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Knorr-Bremse Global Care North America Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Knorr-Bremse Global Care North America Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 6 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
23

Total granted

$1.5M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    Fundacion bendix ac
    4× · 2020–2024 · $365k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $289k · revenue -30%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ARTS-INSPIRED LEARNING
    4× · 2020–2024 · $280k · revenue -4%

Funded once

  • J
    JEFFERSON-LEWIS-HAMILTON-HERKIMER-ONEIDA-BOCES
    one grant, 2022 · $130k
  • NG
    Next Generation In Trucking Foundation Corporation
    one grant, 2022 · $128k · revenue -33% · 74% of their budget
  • CN
    CBTIS Nursing Vocational Tech School
    one grant, 2023 · $102k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
2
Boys & Girls Clubs of Cleveland

To inspire and enable young people who need us most to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.

3
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
4
Breakthrough Public Schools

The breakthrough public schools mission is to provide cleveland area scholars with an education that empowers them to lead lives full of impact and opportunity.

Education
5
Boys & Girls Club of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc

The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys' & Girls' Club of Chester

The organizations mission is to nurture the development of our young people and guide them along the path to future success by providing an environment that supports excellence

7
University of Cleveland Preparatory School

Our mission is to prepare students for a college preparatory high school that will ensure success and graduation and acceptance into a four year college.

Education
8
Creative City Public Charter School Foundation Inc

Creative City Public Charter School's teachers, students and parents share governance and cooperate on curriculum and community decisions, building on the inquisitive nature of children to drive the project-based arts-integrated…

Education
9
Project Grad Akron

In collaboration with community partners, project grad akron will provide a system of programs, supports, and scholarships for underrepresented students to achieve success from pre-kindergarten through career.

Education
10
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
11
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
12
Ambition Preparatory Charter School

Through high-quality instruction, intensive academic supports, and hard work, ambition preparatory charter school ensures that all students in kindergarten through grade eight have academic skills and self-discipline for college and life…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Community School and the most unlike its peers is Next Generation in Trucking Foundation Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fundacion bendix ac — $365,050 · OtherFundacion bendix acBOYS HOPE AND GIRLS HOPE — $160,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE AND GIRLS HOPEJEFFERSON-LEWIS-HAMILTON-HERKIMER-ONEIDA-BOCES — $130,000 · OtherJEFFERSON-LEWIS-HAMILTON-HERKIMER-ONEIDA-BOCESNext Generation In Trucking Foundation Corporation — $127,760 · OtherNext Generation In Trucking Foundation CorporationCBTIS Nursing Vocational Tech School — $102,270 · OtherCBTIS Nursing Vocational Tech SchoolBoys and Girls Club of Westminster — $87,600 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of WestminsterCARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · OtherESPERANZA INC — $60,000 · Otherboys hope girls hope of northeast ohio — $48,000 · Other+7 more — $132,750 · Other+7 moreFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $288,820 · EducationFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SC…CENTER FOR ARTS-INSPIRED LEARNING — $280,000 · EducationCENTER FOR ARTS-INSPIRED L…CRISPUS ATTUCKS CHARTER SCHOOL — $45,000 · EducationCRISPUS ATTUCKS CHARTER SC…AMANDLA INC — $260,800 · Youth DevelopmentAMANDLA INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $79,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS…+1 more — $8,970 · Youth DevelopmentCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $150,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC THEATRE OF KENTUCKY INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureSKIDMARK CLE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureHOPE IGNITES — $80,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $15,000 · Human ServicesWATERTOWN URBAN MISSION — $15,000 · Human ServicesMID-ATLANTIC GIGABIT INNOVATION COLLABORATORY INC — $77,535 · Science & TechUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · InternationalJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING — $8,280 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,273,430Education$613,820Youth Development$348,770Arts & Culture$190,000Human Services$110,000Science & Tech$77,535International$50,000Crime & Legal$8,280

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $288,820 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR ARTS-INSPIRED LEARNING — $280,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetAMANDLA INC — $260,800 over 3y, 16% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $150,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNext Generation In Trucking Foundation Corporation — $127,760 over 1y, 74% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Westminster — $87,600 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetHOPE IGNITES — $80,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $79,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMID-ATLANTIC GIGABIT INNOVATION COLLABORATORY INC — $77,535 over 1y, 19% of budgetESPERANZA INC — $60,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRISPUS ATTUCKS CHARTER SCHOOL — $45,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPUBLIC THEATRE OF KENTUCKY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATERTOWN URBAN MISSION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSKIDMARK CLE — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARROLL COUNTY INC — $8,970 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Abington FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Abington Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Knorr-Bremse Global Care North America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph