Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kln Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$166kPhilanthropy$113kYouth Development$55kFood & Nutrition$28kHousing & Shelter$27kEducation$20kReligion$16kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$814k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY$15,000
SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$15,000
GRACE BIBLE CHURCH$5,000
YOUTH WORLD DALLAS (CHURCH OF FAITH)$5,000
GIRLS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY$4,000
HOPELINK$4,000
THE FAMILY PLACE$4,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF TARRANT COUNTY$3,000
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY$3,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY$3,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$2,000
LOVING LUNCHES$2,000
DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
MISSION METROPLEX$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOPELINK: $8k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 8%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%THE FAMILY PLACE: $4k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $3k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $3k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $2k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $2k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $2k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $1k → 14%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $15k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $15k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $26k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$447k · 18 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$447k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+21%

Still filing today

72%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $97k · revenue +52%
  • GI
    GIRLS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $42k · revenue +195%
  • H
    HOPELINK
    4× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • OU
    OLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +8%
  • IT
    Illinois Theatre Association
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • L1
    LUKE 181 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
2
Uptown Dallas Inc

The corporation is organized for the following purposes: to promote the area known as uptown in dallas, texas ("uptown"); to provide a safer environment. the corporation is organized for the following purposes: to promote the area special…

Community Improvement
3
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
4
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
5
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
6
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
7
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
8
Central Texas Food Bank Inc

To increase food access in Central Texas by providing nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through programs, education, and innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
9
Meals On Wheels North Central Texas Inc

Organization provides services to senior citizens and the disabled, primarily through home-delivered meals and congregate meals.

Human Services
10
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
12
Tarrant County Homeless Coalition

Tarrant County Homeless Coalition leads the community solution to homelessness in greater Tarrant and Parker counties by serving as a catalyst for community transformation.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $97,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTYHOPELINK: $20,500 · Human ServicesHOPELINKThe Family Place: $15,500 · Human ServicesThe Family Place+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesGRACE: $45,000 · OtherGRACEHOPELINK: $15,000 · OtherHOPELINKUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $14,000 · OtherUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant C…SALVATION ARMY: $11,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMISSION ARLINGTON INC: $10,500 · OtherMISSION ARLINGTON INCNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKThe YouthVantage Alliance: $8,000 · OtherThe YouthVantage AllianceCHRISTMAS IS FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 · OtherGRACE BIBLE CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherYOUTH WORLD DALLAS (CHURCH OF FAITH): $5,000 · OtherIllinois Theatre Association: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $9,000 · Other+4 moreUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $104,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUN…THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES: $6,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyGIRLS INC: $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCTHE ATTIC LEARNING COMMUNITY: $15,000 · EducationOLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $5,000 · EducationTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $12,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$135,000Other$143,500Philanthropy$114,000Youth Development$42,000Education$20,000Housing & Shelter$12,500Food & Nutrition$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY: $104,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $97,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS INC: $42,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPELINK: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATTIC LEARNING COMMUNITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe YouthVantage Alliance: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLUKE 181 FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSTUDIO EAST TRAINING FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION METROPLEX INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds THE ATTIC LEARNING COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The YouthVantage Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds OLD UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Theatre Association ↗
  • Who funds LUKE 181 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO EAST TRAINING FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION METROPLEX INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX17.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · America's Charities · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Markham Family Foundation · The Morris Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kln Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kln Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kln’s filings →

    More from the funding graph