Skip to content
Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation

We build a better future for children by providing scholarships & leadership training to college and high school students; grants to our kiwanis clubs and six children's hospitals; and through our innovative pediatric trauma program.

$315k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$775kHuman Services$67kEducation$54kRecreation & Sports$50kPhilanthropy$48kHousing & Shelter$25kEnvironment$20kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $160,841, the rows itemized in this filing. The $314,856 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $154,015 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE$28,277
LOMA LINDA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$24,750
KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN$23,844
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO$20,998
UCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OAKLAND$20,000
RENOWN HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
LA CANADA KIWANIS FOUNDATION$13,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF GLENDALE FOUNDATION$8,000
CAL-NEV-HA DISTICT OF KIWANIS$6,972
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $12k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE SOUTH BAY: $12k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAI'I: $12k → 9%KIWANIS CLUB OF DOWNTOWN SPARKS: $5k → 10%KIWANIS CLUB OF POWAY: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 75% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 68%.

Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+412%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +8%
  • KH
    Kapi'olani Health Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +144%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $167k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO GREATER MODESTO INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY Ngraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +228%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +320%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF SACRAMENTO
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation

We build a better future for children by providing scholarships & leadership training to college and high school students; grants to our kiwanis clubs and six children's hospitals; and through our innovative pediatric trauma program.

—
2
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

To restore, sustain and enhance the health and developmental potential of children through excellence in care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Oakland Family House

Provide temporary housing for families of patients at ucsf benioff children's hospital oakland.

Health
4
Providence Trinitycare Hospice

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
5
Kiwanis Club of Claremont Foundation

The mission of the Kiwanis Club of Claremont is to actively support programs that contribute to the growth and health of the Claremont community. Following Kiwanis International's defining statement being a "global organization of…

Human Services
6
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
7
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

Health
8
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

Health
9
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
10
Valley Children's Hospital

To provide high quality comprehensive healthcare services to children regardless of their ability to pay and to continuously improve the health and well-being of children.

Health
11
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn
Philanthropy
12
Community Health Partners

Community health partners' mission is to build the valley's premier integrated healthcare delivery system that reliably meets the healthcare needs of our region while exceeding patient expectations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Children's Healthcare Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kiwanis Club of Downtown Sparks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Kapi'olani Health Foundation: $168,376 · HealthKapi'olani Health FoundationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND: $167,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLA…VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $159,326 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · HealthLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $199,697 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL…Renown Health Foundation: $127,455 · OtherRenown Health FoundationCAL-NEV-HA DISTRICT OF KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL: $92,953 · OtherCAL-NEV-HA DISTRICT OF KIWANIS INTERNATIO…+3 more: $33,427 · Other+3 moreRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $186,207 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S H…FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $12,427 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $12,427 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES: $12,427 · Human ServicesKIWANIS CLUB OF POWAY CA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesKIWANIS CLUB OF DOWNTOWN SPARKS: $5,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC: $12,427 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF SANTA CLARITA VALLEY: $12,427 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO GREATER MODESTO INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY N: $12,427 · Religion
Health$504,702Other$453,532Philanthropy$186,207Human Services$47,281Housing & Shelter$24,854Religion$12,427

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $199,697 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $186,207 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKapi'olani Health Foundation: $168,376 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND: $167,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $159,326 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRenown Health Foundation: $127,455 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCAL-NEV-HA DISTRICT OF KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL: $92,953 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER MODESTO GREATER MODESTO INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY N: $12,427 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $12,427 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $12,427 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC: $12,427 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SANTA CLARITA VALLEY: $12,427 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES: $12,427 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetKIWANIS FAMILY HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF POWAY CA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF DOWNTOWN SPARKS: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Family Promise IncAmerican Cancer Socie…Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Family Promise IncNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Family Promise Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home