Skip to content
Kinnie Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kinnie Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$600k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$809kHealth$512kReligion$422kPublic Safety & Disaster$229kFood & Nutrition$190kHuman Services$175kPhilanthropy$167kArts & Culture$165kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $570k
$18,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIRECT RELIEF$47,000
ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS$32,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MATTHEW$31,000
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$27,000
Individual grant recipient$26,000
OHSU FOUNDATION$26,000
OUTSIDE IN$25,000
CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER$25,000
CANDLELIGHTERS - PORTLAND$24,000
CARE PARTNERS$24,000
Individual grant recipient$24,000
PORTLAND RESCUE MISSION$24,000
BOYS & GIRLS AID SOCIETY$21,000
RIP MEDICAL DEBT$21,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $387k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $25k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $24k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $24k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $23k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $21k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $21k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $19k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $24k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $18k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $23k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $22k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $22k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $20k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $19k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $17k → 8%CARE PARTNERS: $15k → 8%HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $12k → 8%HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $11k → 8%HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 8%HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 8%DRESS FOR SUCCESS OREGON: $5k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS OREGON: $4k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS OREGON: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 36 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
1

Total granted

$3.6M
$20k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    8× · 2017–2024 · $345k · revenue +94%
  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $229k · revenue +129%
  • MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
3
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
7
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
8
Northwest Human Services Inc

Mission: creating a healthy community with respect, compassion and acceptance for all. vision: working together to empower individuals to improve their health, well-being and safety. core values: community - the safe, caring, and inclusive…

Human Services
9
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
11
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical Teams International; the most unlike its peers is Naturopaths Without Borders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
10/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHSU FOUNDATION: $167,000 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATIONST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MATTHEW: $167,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MATTHEWCANDLELIGHTERS - PORTLAND: $165,000 · OtherCANDLELIGHTERS - PORTLANDIndividual grant recipient: $164,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUTSIDE IN: $162,000 · OtherOUTSIDE INIndividual grant recipient: $157,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPORTLAND RESCUE MISSION: $157,000 · OtherPORTLAND RESCUE MISSIONBOYS & GIRLS AID SOCIETY: $142,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS AID SOCIETYSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER: $90,000 · OtherPARKINSONS RESOURCES OF O: $83,000 · OtherOREGON STATE PARKS TRUST: $75,000 · OtherGOOD NEIGHBOR FAMILY PANTRY: $72,000 · OtherTO BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $67,000 · Other+10 more: $293,000 · Other+10 moreDIRECT RELIEF: $345,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $205,000 · InternationalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATION…Mercy Corps: $132,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $127,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCClackamas Service Center: $175,000 · Human ServicesClackamas Ser…CARE PARTNERS: $162,000 · Human ServicesCARE PARTNERSMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT …HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $38,000 · Human ServicesHOMEPLATE YOU…+1 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $229,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $42,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $34,000 · Food & NutritionNATUROPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS: $64,000 · HealthHillsboro Schools Foundation: $57,000 · Education
Other$1,961,000International$809,000Human Services$428,000Public Safety & Disaster$229,000Food & Nutrition$76,000Health$64,000Education$57,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $345,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $229,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $205,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetClackamas Service Center: $175,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetCARE PARTNERS: $162,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $162,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Corps: $132,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $127,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER: $90,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetNATUROPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS: $64,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetHillsboro Schools Foundation: $57,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPROJECT HOMELESS CONNECT WASHINGTON COUNTY: $52,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $42,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $41,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII PET NETWORK INC: $39,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES: $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $34,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDress for Success Oregon: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFOCUS ON YOUTH: $11,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Clackamas Service Center ↗
  • Who funds CARE PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATUROPATHS WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds Hillsboro Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOMELESS CONNECT WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII PET NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dress for Success Oregon ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Marie Lamfrom Charita…The Robert D and Marc…The Harold & Arlene S…Juan Young TrustOCF Joseph E Weston P…The Collins FoundationThe Autzen FoundationThe Reser Family Foun…Maybelle Clark Macdon…Meyer Memorial TrustHillman Family Founda…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR23.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Meyer Memorial Trust · Hillman Family Foundations

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kinnie Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kinnie Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Sexual Assault Resource Center: 81% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Homeplate Youth Services: 17% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • Clackamas Service Center: 9% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kinnie Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home