· Public charity
Kingdom Builder Foundation
To provide members and friends of solana beach presbyterian church the opportunity to leave legacy gifts to be invested conservatively and granted annually to invest in the kingdom through our church, community and world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $331,915 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $346,719 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,804 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANT WITH PURPOSE | $75,122 |
| CASA DE AMISTAD | $50,000 |
| PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP | $49,815 |
| SOLANA BEACH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $38,122 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $12,182 |
| CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| ORDER OF MALTA CLINIC OF SAN DIEGO | $10,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL SERVICE FELLOWSHIP | $10,000 |
| INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $8,750 |
| HOPE WITHOUT BOUNDRIES | $8,000 |
| OPERATION MOBILIZATION | $8,000 |
| WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP | $8,000 |
| LADLE FELLOWSHIP | $8,000 |
| ASCENDING LEADERS | $7,500 |
| MISSION FLIGHT | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $750k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PTPATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP9× · 2017–2025 · $443k · revenue +155%
- FUFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED6× · 2017–2025 · $238k · revenue +280%
- YLYOUNG LIFE7× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- BFBUILDING FOR CHRIST MINISTRY3× · 2022–2024 · $11k
- MGMESA GLOBAL2× · 2023–2024 · $11k
- AFALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +364%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious
International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
The primary purpose of Crossroads is to engage in Christian religious and missionary service to assist in improving and ameliorating the moral and social conditions of humanity and to provide services to Gods people which will enable them…
Journey To Destiny Ministries (JTDM) is a global, faith-based nonprofit organization committed to transforming and restoring dignity, hope, and opportunity to vulnerable individualsespecially children, women, and families affected by…
Religious
R.A.W. Ruth Anointed World Ministries is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. We provide ministry services in the area of relief to poor, distressed; underprivileged; and those suffering due to daily life challenges…
Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.
One Way Ministries exists to reach impoverished, desperate and forgotten people groups with the Gospel of Jesus Christ through a variety of venues including community outreach events, food and clothing distribution, construction projects,…
Religious and counselling
Connexion is an evangelism and discipleship ministry working with churches in Africaand other countries to provide materials, training, participants and opportunities to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ through our sponsored projects.
To provide loving support for orphaned children, fostering a greater capacity for physical, spiritual, and emotional healing and growth, and deploying the local church to do the same.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amor Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hope Without Boundaries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP ↗
- Who funds CASA DE AMISTAD CENTRO DE ENSENANZA ↗
- Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SERVICE FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds HOPE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES ↗
- Who funds WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION MATTHEW 633 INC ↗
- Who funds ORDER OF MALTA CLINIC OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds AMOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ONE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL CARE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN YOUTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds ASCENDING LEADERS ↗
- Who funds THE A PARTNERS DBA THE ANTIOCH PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MISSION FLIGHT ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds LIVING THE DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds GENERATEHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Forman Christian College Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER DBA PATHWAY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SONRISE HARBOR INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Ho Hing Dai Family Foundation Inc · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Sempra Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Baird Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kingdom Builder Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.