Skip to content

· Private foundation

King Ranch Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$100kHealth$38kCivil Rights$30kFood & Nutrition$22kHuman Services$22kArts & Culture$18kAnimals$15kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$456k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$6,000
MAKE-A-WISH$2,500
FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN$2,500
OPERATION SMILE$2,500
JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY$2,000
WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION$2,000
BOY SCOUTS - GLACIER'S EDGE$1,500
BOY SCOUTS - SAMOSET$1,500
BOY SCOUTS - THREE HARBORS$1,500
BOY SCOUTS - GATEWAY AREA$1,500
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
BOY SCOUTS - BAY LAKES$1,500
WILLOW SPRINGS LIONS CLUB$1,500
BOY SCOUTS - POTAWATOMI AREA$1,500
BOY SCOUTS - CHIPPEWA VALLEY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOY SCOUTS - POTAWATOMI AREA: $2k → 5%WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%BOY SCOUTS - GLACIER'S EDGE: $2k → 10%BOY SCOUTS - SAMOSET: $2k → 11%BOY SCOUTS - CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $2k → 12%BOY SCOUTS - GATEWAY AREA: $2k → 12%JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY: $3k → 17%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $3k → 9%MAKE-A-WISH: $5k → 14%BLACK HILLS WILD HORSE SANCTUARY: $5k → 15%JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY: $3k → 17%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $3k → 9%THE JOURNEY MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 14%BLACK HILLS WILD HORSE SANCTUARY: $3k → 15%JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY: $3k → 17%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%THE JOURNEY MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 14%BLACK HILLS WILD HORSE SANCTUARY: $3k → 15%JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY: $3k → 17%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%JOURNEY MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 14%BLACK HILLS WILD HORSE SANCTUARY: $3k → 15%JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY: $3k → 17%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%JOURNEY MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 14%JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY: $3k → 17%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH: $3k → 14%YOUNG AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH: $3k → 14%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH: $3k → 14%YOUNG AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%JOURNEY MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH: $3k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH: $3k → 14%JOURNEY MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 14%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$249k · 24 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$249k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+101%

Still filing today

46%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +67%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +0%
  • JO
    JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +545%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BLACK HILLS PLAYHOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +101%
  • 3J
    37TH JUDICIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scouting America Longhorn Council

Prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
2
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

—
3
Sioux Council Boy Scouts of America Inc

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.scout oath:on my honor, i will do my best to do my duty…

—
4
Central Mn Council of Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout law and oath.

—
5
Boy Scouts of America Sagamore Council 162

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
6
Pathway to the Rockies Council Boy Scouts of America

The council promotes the ability of boys, girls, young men and women to do things for themselves and others, training them in scoutcraft, and teaching them patriotism, courage, self-reliance, and kindred virtues, using the methods which…

Youth Development
7
Boy Scouts of America 388 Greater Hudson Valley Council

It is the mission of scouting america, greater hudson valley council, inc. to deliver the highest-quality, values-based youth program of character development and leadership training, based upon the precepts embodied in the scout oath and…

—
8
Boy Scouts of America Central Nc Council #416

The mission of the bsa is to prepare young people to make ethical decisions over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. the bsa program seeks to positively impact youth risk behaviors, juvenile crime,…

—
9
Lasalle Council Inc Boy Scouts of America #165

The corporation shall promote within the territory covered by the charter and from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts…

—
10
Flint River Council Inc 95 Scouting America

The flint river council shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy…

—
11
Pacific Skyline Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
12
Boy Scouts of America Council No 604 Blue Mountain Council Inc

To promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of america, the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of South Dakota & Montana; the most unlike its peers is Operation Smile Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Young America's Foundation: $35,500 · OtherYoung America's FoundationMAKE-A-WISH: $17,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISHBOY SCOUTS - POTAWATOMI AREA: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - POTAWATOMI AREABOY SCOUTS - GATEWAY AREA: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - GATEWAY AREABOY SCOUTS - BAY LAKES: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - BAY LAKESBOY SCOUTS - SAMOSET: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - SAMOSETBOY SCOUTS - GLACIER'S EDGE: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - GLACIER'S EDGEBOY SCOUTS - CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - CHIPPEWA VALLEYBOY SCOUTS - THREE HARBORS: $11,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS - THREE HARBORSMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA: $5,500 · Other+10 more: $23,500 · Other+10 moreFISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $23,500 · HealthFISHER HOU…JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC: $21,500 · Food & NutritionJUST ONE …MUSEUM ALLIANCE OF RAPID CITY INC: $15,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BLACK HILLS PLAYHOUSE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE OF THE RANGE & THE AMERICAN MUSTANG: $14,500 · AnimalsOPERATION SMILE INC: $8,500 · InternationalWISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Community Improvement
Other$159,000Health$23,500Food & Nutrition$21,500Arts & Culture$18,000Animals$14,500International$8,500Community Improvement$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYoung America's Foundation: $35,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $23,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC: $21,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ALLIANCE OF RAPID CITY INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetINSTITUTE OF THE RANGE & THE AMERICAN MUSTANG: $14,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLACK HILLS PLAYHOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE HARBORS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget37TH JUDICIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds JUST ONE MORE MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ALLIANCE OF RAPID CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF THE RANGE & THE AMERICAN MUSTANG ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA & MONTANA ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK HILLS PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds BAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THREE HARBORS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds 37TH JUDICIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI13.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization King Ranch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from King Ranch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on King Ranch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph