Skip to content
Kim Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Kim Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$417k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.0MHuman Services$1.9MYouth Development$315kHousing & Shelter$314kCrime & Legal$285kPublic Benefit$250kArts & Culture$146kPublic Safety & Disaster$140kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $362k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
COMPLETELY KIDS$25,000
CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE$25,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER$25,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA$25,000
BRYAN FOUNDATION$20,000
CAROLE'S HOUSE OF HOPE$20,000
BRYAN FOUNDATION$20,000
ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$20,000
RESPECT$20,000
PROJECT HARMONY$20,000
HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
CENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT$20,000
STEPHEN CENTER INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $40k → 6%CHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $15k → 12%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $30k → 6%KVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE NE INC: $40k → 5%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $30k → 6%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $25k → 6%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $20k → 6%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $15k → 6%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $20k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $16k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $15k → 12%WELLBEING INITIATIVE: $50k → 13%WELLBEING INITIATIVE: $25k → 13%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $20k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%WELLBEING INITIATIVE: $25k → 13%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $40k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $35k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $34k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $25k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $300k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $55k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $35k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $30k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $23k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $23k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $50k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $45k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $40k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $29k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $25k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE CENTER: $25k → 12%NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $20k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 12%NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $20k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $20k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 40 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
15

Total granted

$5.1M
$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+12%

Still filing today

85%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $516k · revenue +55%
  • NM
    NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +95%
  • CS
    CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $334k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERISITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • NY
    NEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
2
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
3
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
4
Central Kansas Mental Health Center

To make life better in our communities by providing excellent mental health services, education, and integrated health care which exceeds clients' expectations.

—
5
Mental Health Systems Inc

To improve the lives of individuals, families, and communities impacted by substance abuse and behavioral health disorders.

Health
6
Family and Children's Center Inc

To serve children, families, and individuals with a continuum of services designed to strengthen families and promote individual well-being.

Human Services
7
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
8
Nebraska Methodist Health System Inc

Nebraska methodist health system is committed to improving the health of our communities by the way we care, educate and innovate.

Health
9
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
10
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
11
Physicians Clinic Inc

Methodist physicians clinic provides accessible, quality medical care through its integrated team of health professionals, including specialists in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery,…

Health
12
Center for Mental Health

The center for mental health partners with people and communities to produce exceptional mental health and substance abuse services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Smart Gen Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
35/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $516,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INCCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $334,048 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INCHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $318,919 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICEHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING A…CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $145,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTERWELLBEING INITIATIVE INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesWELLBEING INITIATIVE INCOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $71,000 · Human Services+6 more: $200,000 · Human Services+6 moreNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $450,000 · HealthNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL…COMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $160,833 · HealthCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILI…Bryan Foundation: $140,000 · HealthBryan FoundationCENTERPOINTE INC: $137,457 · HealthCENTERPOINTE INCBryan Medical Center: $135,000 · HealthBryan Medical CenterNEBRASKA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION: $95,000 · HealthNEBRASKA STATE SUICIDE PREV…CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $86,640 · HealthCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER …CENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT: $76,040 · HealthCENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOP…+3 more: $45,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $245,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE A…SALVATION ARMY: $108,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $95,000 · OtherONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH C…STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION: $90,000 · OtherSTATE SUICIDE PREVENTION CO…Individual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherUNIVERISITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherNAMI NEBRASKA: $50,113 · OtherRESPECT2: $144,842 · OtherRESPECT2FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATIONHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $60,000 · Other+13 more: $210,091 · Other+13 moreCOMPLETELY KIDS: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentSmart Gen Society Inc: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCarole's House of Hope: $250,000 · Public BenefitMODERN WARRIOR LIVE: $10,000 · Public BenefitPROJECT HARMONY: $224,757 · Crime & LegalSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $103,100 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $80,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,854,967Health$1,325,970Other$1,368,046Youth Development$330,000Public Benefit$260,000Crime & Legal$224,757Housing & Shelter$183,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $516,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $334,048 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $318,919 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCarole's House of Hope: $250,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $245,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $224,757 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $200,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $160,833 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $160,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $145,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRESPECT2: $144,842 over 7y, 14% of budgetBryan Foundation: $140,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetCENTERPOINTE INC: $137,457 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBryan Medical Center: $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWELLBEING INITIATIVE INC: $110,000 over 4y, 42% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $103,100 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNEBRASKA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION: $95,000 over 5y, 49% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $86,640 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT: $76,040 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $71,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSmart Gen Society Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI NEBRASKA: $50,113 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $31,355 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetConnection Project Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetCUES FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMODERN WARRIOR LIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetRISE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Co-Responder Alliance Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Carole's House of Hope ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RESPECT2 ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTERPOINTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds WELLBEING INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA STATE SUICIDE PREVENTION COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Smart Gen Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAMI NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS ↗
  • Who funds KVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood Foundati…The Lozier FoundationMutual of Omaha Found…The Hawks FoundationImmanuel Community Vi…United Way of the Mid…The Charles and Mary …Leland J & Dorothy H …Robert B Daugherty Fo…Weitz Family Foundati…Todd and Mary Heistan…Suzanne & Walter Scot…
The Sherwood FoundationNE59.1× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kim Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kim’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home