Skip to content

· Community foundation

Kiawah Cares Foundation

To improve the quality of life of our Sea Island neighbors on Johns Island and Wadmalaw Island through community partnerships.

$360k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$232k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MFood & Nutrition$132kReligion$97kArts & Culture$82kPublic Benefit$72kHealth$53kRecreation & Sports$25kPhilanthropy$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $339,020, the rows itemized in this filing. The $359,693 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,673 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $232k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$409k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Angel Oak Elementary School$232,295
Mt Zion Elementary School$20,000
Palmetto Project$16,500
St Johns High School$14,725
Reading Partners South Carolina$10,000
Circle Of Life Program$10,000
Heal with Hearts$8,000
Sea Island Habitat for Humanity$7,500
Lowcountry Equine Assisted Psychotherapy$5,000
The Charleston Gaillard Center$5,000
Charleston AreaTherapeutic Riding Inc$5,000
Warrior WOD Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Heal with Hearts: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 13 repeat orgs$272k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$1.8M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+13%

Still filing today

54%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PALMETTO PROJECT INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +23%
  • RP
    READING PARTNERS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +1%
  • KW
    KIAWAH WOMENS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $34k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • JI
    JOHNS ISLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CU
    Clemson University
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
2
Cape Charles Christian School Inc

Trusting in Gods guidance, the mission of Cape Charles School is to educate and develop the Whole Child in a non-denominational Christian setting

Education
3
Food for Little Rascals Inc

Food for Little Rascals Inc (FFLR) is operated exclusively to improve the health, welfare, and care of children in the State of South Carolina.

—
4
Palmetto Charter School Inc

The mission of the school is to create a superior learning environment founded upon the shared values of hard work, honor, self-discipline,and community and parental involvement, with the purpose of preparing students for academic and…

Education
5
Goucher Charter School

Goucher charter academy's mission is believing in nurturing the whole child through leadership and community service.

Education
6
Communities in Schools of Cape Fear Inc

To surround at risk students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Human Services
7
Empowered Minds of South Carolina

We bring yoga and mindfulness to public now-income schools

Youth Development
8
Carolina Collaborative Prep

Carolina collaborative prep (ccp) is a non-profit academic center that serves students in grades 3-12 with learning differences, empowering them to thrive in school and in life.

Education
9
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
10
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
11
James Island Outreach

James island outreach uplifts and unites our community by helping neighbors with basic and emergency services.

Housing & Shelter
12
Wings for Kids

Wings for kids equips at-risk children with social and emotional skills they need to succeed in school, stay in school, and thrive in life. the organization operates afterschool programs at title i elementary schools in the southeast;…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Lady of Mercy Community Outreach Services; the most unlike its peers is Barrier Islands Little League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Angel Oak Elementary School: $601,427 · OtherAngel Oak Elementary SchoolCHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $566,336 · OtherCHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $117,515 · OtherPALMETTO PROJECT INCJOHNS ISLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH HOME IMPROV PROGRAM: $92,150 · OtherJOHNS ISLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH HOME IMPROV PROGRAMCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE CHARLESTON AREA INC: $78,471 · Other+17 more: $268,220 · Other+17 moreREADING PARTNERS: $87,500 · EducationKIAWAH WOMENS FOUNDATION: $33,591 · EducationCommunities in Schools of South Carolina: $10,000 · EducationSea Island Hunger Awareness Foundation: $92,941 · Food & NutritionHANDS OF CHRIST: $5,000 · Food & NutritionWARRIOR WOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthLOWCOUNTRY EQUINE-ASSISTED PSYCHOTHERAPY: $12,500 · HealthVISION TO LEARN: $10,000 · HealthCHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $5,000 · HealthROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthGOING PLACES: $15,876 · Recreation & SportsBARRIER ISLANDS LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $8,700 · Recreation & SportsHEAL WITH HEARTS: $8,000 · Human ServicesCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,724,119Education$131,091Food & Nutrition$97,941Health$52,500Recreation & Sports$24,576Human Services$8,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $117,515 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetSea Island Hunger Awareness Foundation: $92,941 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $87,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE CHARLESTON AREA INC: $78,471 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWARRIOR WOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY EQUINE-ASSISTED PSYCHOTHERAPY: $12,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCOASTAL CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA: $11,910 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCommunities in Schools of South Carolina: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARRIER ISLANDS LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $8,700 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetHEAL WITH HEARTS: $8,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetSea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALMETTO PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Sea Island Hunger Awareness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE CHARLESTON AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds KIAWAH WOMENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR WOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOING PLACES ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF MERCY COMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY EQUINE-ASSISTED PSYCHOTHERAPY ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools of South Carolina ↗
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds BARRIER ISLANDS LITTLE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAL WITH HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds Sea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds ROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Joanna Foundation · Beyond Our Gates Foundation of Kiawah & Seabrook · Trident United Way · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Mark Elliott Motley Foundation Inc · George R & Janet E Desko Charitable Foundation · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Tara Foundation · Post and Courier Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiawah Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiawah Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kiawah Cares Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kiawah Cares Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiawah Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph