Skip to content

· Private foundation

Khushalani Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$64kHealth$61kReligion$42kPhilanthropy$21kInternational$19kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$16kHousing & Shelter$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,497
Median grant
10
States reached
$681k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vivekananda Education Society$5,728
Jeevan Asha Charitable Trust$5,200
South Asian Mental Inititative Network$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Chinmaya Mission$2,750
Parmar Humanitarian Service$2,750
Individual grant recipient$2,410
Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston$2,000
The Salvation Army$2,000
Shriners Hospitals for Children$1,500
ALSAC - St Jude Children's Research Hospital$1,500
The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International$1,500
PFAT$1,500
Ampillon$1,497
Asian Institute$1,222
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($257k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($34k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%100 Club of West Texas: $300 → 17%100 Club of West Texas: $100 → 17%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $500 → 9%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $500 → 9%India House: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
SD
IN
NJ
CA
UT
WV
VA
AZ
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($34k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$34k · 13 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222k · 40 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
48

Total granted

$222k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +67%
  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • SS
    Sugarland Sitrama Trust
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SS
    Sugarland Sitaram Trust
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IM
    Interfaith Ministry
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
5
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
6
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
7
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
10
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
11
Urology Care Foundation Inc

We support, through philanthropic efforts, the improvement of urological care globally by funding research, clinical education, patient education, and humanitarian programs.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kaylor Yetto Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
21/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chinmaya Mission: $27,750 · OtherChinmaya MissionJEEVAN ASHA Trust: $24,800 · OtherJEEVAN ASHA TrustVivekanada Educational Society: $20,092 · OtherVivekanada Educational SocietyParmar Humanitarian Service: $11,500 · OtherVivekananda Education Society: $11,456 · OtherSugarland Sitrama Trust: $10,000 · OtherSugarland Sitaram Trust: $10,000 · OtherFeeding the Homeless Project Mission: $9,316 · OtherSouth Asian Mental Inititative Network: $9,000 · OtherSOUTH ASIAN MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE AND NETWORK: $8,500 · OtherJeevan Asha Charitable Trust: $8,284 · Other+60 more: $94,594 · Other+60 moreSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $12,178 · Housing & ShelterPOSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA: $8,700 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,503 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $120 · Arts & CultureSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,500 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY: $1,000 · HealthNational Center For Homeopathy: $500 · HealthTHE HEART INSTITUTE: $500 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $375 · AnimalsHouston Zoo Inc: $250 · AnimalsTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Community Improvement
Other$245,292Housing & Shelter$12,178Arts & Culture$10,323Health$8,700International$6,500Animals$5,125Community Improvement$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $12,178 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA: $8,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,503 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNICEF USA Impact Fund for Children Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $630 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIRO: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KAYLOR YETTO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Center For Homeopathy: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOYS FOR TOTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINDIA HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget100 CLUB OF WEST TEXAS: $400 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $375 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Public Media Foundation: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE FUTURES NETWORK DBA YES MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Khushalani Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Khushalani Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Khushalani’s filings →

More from the funding graph