Skip to content
Kevin and Masha Keating Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kevin and Masha Keating Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$452kEducation$323kHealth$125kInternational$33kPhilanthropy$30kHousing & Shelter$24kArts & Culture$19kHuman Services$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLAUDIUS CROZET PARK INC$10,000
CHABAD OF S BARBARA$3,600
CAMP GAN ISRAEL$3,600
PH FOUNDATION$3,500
CAROLINAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEROES AND HORSES: $10k → 10%SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$662k · 10 repeat orgs$363k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$662k
$342k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+55%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    SANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM
    4× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +59%
  • HH
    HILLSIDE HOUSE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $19k · revenue +71%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $16k · revenue +222%

Funded once

  • WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +42%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE CARE
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
2
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
3
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
4
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Sustainable Path Foundation

Sustainable Path Foundation promotes sustainability and health in the Puget Sound region through collaborative approaches informed by scientific understanding and systems thinking.

Social Science
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
9
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

It is the mission of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.

Health
10
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
11
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
12
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ph Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF S BARBARA INC: $411,306 · OtherCHABAD OF S BARBARA INCUC REGENTS: $120,000 · OtherUC REGENTSSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATIONVISITING NURSE & HOSPICE CARE: $30,000 · Other+19 more: $95,020 · Other+19 moreWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNI…COURAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationCOURAGE FOUNDATIONPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,500 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FO…+1 more: $3,000 · EducationSanta Barbara Hillel: $36,800 · PhilanthropySANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $26,200 · PhilanthropyThe Rona Barrett Foundation: $4,500 · PhilanthropyPH FOUNDATION: $3,500 · PhilanthropySANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $25,986 · HealthSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $5,000 · HealthVIKING CHARITIES INC: $1,300 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $28,640 · InternationalFRIENDS OF KING'S COLLEGE LONDON ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalHEROES AND HORSES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES: $3,000 · Public Benefit
Other$706,326Education$193,500Philanthropy$71,000Health$32,286International$31,640Human Services$13,500Public Benefit$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSanta Barbara Hillel: $36,800 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $28,640 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $26,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $25,986 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCOURAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHILLSIDE HOUSE: $19,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN PARATUBERCULOSIS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 53% of budgetCLAUDIUS CROZET PARK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHEROES AND HORSES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSanta Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rona Barrett Foundation: $4,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPH FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KING'S COLLEGE LONDON ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVIKING CHARITIES INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC: $270 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara Foundat…Ann Jackson Family Fo…Hutton Foundation Dba…Mosher FoundationAlice Tweed Tuohy Fou…Latkin Charitable Fou…Towbes FoundationWilliams-Corbett Foun…Schlinger Family Foun…Rudi Schulte Family F…The Wood-Claeyssens F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Santa Barbara FoundationCA23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Schlinger Family Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kevin and Masha Keating Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kevin and Masha Keating Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kevin and Masha Keating Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home