· Private foundation
Kevin and Masha Keating Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of KEVIN AND MASHA KEATING FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLAUDIUS CROZET PARK INC | $10,000 |
| CHABAD OF S BARBARA | $3,600 |
| CAMP GAN ISRAEL | $3,600 |
| PH FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| CAROLINAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SYSANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM4× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +59%
- HHHILLSIDE HOUSE3× · 2019–2021 · $19k · revenue +71%
- PUPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2021 · $16k · revenue +222%
Funded once
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +42%- SCSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $50k
- VNVISITING NURSE & HOSPICE CAREone grant, 2019 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.
Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Sustainable Path Foundation promotes sustainability and health in the Puget Sound region through collaborative approaches informed by scientific understanding and systems thinking.
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.
It is the mission of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.
To benefit the university of california santa cruz.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ph Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Hillel ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA YNEZ VALLEY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds COURAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMAN PARATUBERCULOSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEROES AND HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds CLAUDIUS CROZET PARK INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Rona Barrett Foundation ↗
- Who funds SURF HAPPENS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KING'S COLLEGE LONDON ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILDLIFE CENTER OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds VIKING CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Schlinger Family Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kevin and Masha Keating Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.