Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kevin and Mary Grace Burke Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.8MReligion$1.0MRecreation & Sports$183kArts & Culture$104kInternational$15kHuman Services$9kPublic Benefit$9kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ISAACS JOGUES CHURCH$1,003,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$17,500
CATHOLIC MINISTRIES ANNUEAL APPEAL JOLIET DIOCESE$10,000
TELLURIDE FILM FESTIVAL$8,725
HOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST$1,500
DIOCESE OF VENICE FLORIDA$1,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$1,000
OAK CREST DEKALB RETIREMENT CENTER$500
BURRIDGE CENTER FOR FINANCE$500
US ASSISTED GOLF ASSOCIATION$500
CHICAGO PROSTATE FOUNDATION$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
STUDENTS FOR LIFE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE: $1k → 7%UCP SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO: $500 → 14%ANGEL BASKETS: $200 → 7%ANGEL BASKETS: $200 → 7%ANGEL BASKETS: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
WI
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 23 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$2.9M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+13%

Still filing today

30%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    The National Film Preserve Ltd
    8× · 2017–2024 · $102k · revenue +69%
  • HH
    HOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +90%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEANNIE CELLA CHILD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SA
    ST AGNES CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • KH
    KING-BRUWAERT HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
3
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
4
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
7
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King-Bruwaert House and the most unlike its peers is Hinsdale Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPRING HILL COLLEGE — $1,595,000 · EducationSPRING HILL COLLEGE+2 more — $15,000 · EducationST ISAACS JOGUES CHURCH — $1,004,000 · OtherST ISAACS JOGUES CHURCHCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY — $160,000 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY+28 more — $76,000 · Other+28 moreTELLURIDE FOUNDATION — $175,000 · Recreation & SportsThe National Film Preserve Ltd — $102,150 · Arts & CultureHOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST — $14,500 · InternationalKING-BRUWAERT HOUSE — $1,000 · Human ServicesUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO — $500 · Human ServicesAngel Baskets Inc — $500 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $200 · HealthStudents for Life of America Inc — $184 · Civil Rights
Education$1,610,000Other$1,240,000Recreation & Sports$175,000Arts & Culture$102,150International$14,500Human Services$2,000Health$200Civil Rights$184

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPRING HILL COLLEGE — $1,595,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetThe National Film Preserve Ltd — $102,150 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST — $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM GOLF ASSOCIATION — $6,750 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetKING-BRUWAERT HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Baskets Inc — $500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc — $184 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPRING HILL COLLEGE
  • Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The National Film Preserve Ltd
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN CHARITABLE TRUST
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds FREEDOM GOLF ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE
  • Who funds HINSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO
  • Who funds HEPHZIBAH CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Angel Baskets Inc
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kevin and Mary Grace Burke Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph