Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kevin & Greta Warren Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$272k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$745kReligion$240kEducation$138kCivil Rights$101kRecreation & Sports$55kYouth Development$37kHuman Services$29kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$175,000
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW$25,000
TRUE STAR FOUNDATION$20,000
KINGDOM OF LIFE CHURCH$20,000
BEARS CARE$11,213
LAWYERS LEND-A-HAND TO YOUTH$10,000
PAWS CHICAGO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$1,175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLANKETS OF HOPE: $2k → 20%LAWYERS LEND-A-HAND TO YOUTH: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
31

Total granted

$1.2M
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-4%

Still filing today

30%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $634k
  • KO
    KINGDOM OF LIFE CHURCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $194k
  • DS
    DEWEY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $85k

Funded once

  • LC
    LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • MM
    MT MORIAH AME CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • PS
    PROJECT SUCCESSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
2
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
3
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
4
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
7
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
10
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
11
Minnesota Comeback

Driven by an unwavering moral imperative that every child, regardless of its race, income or zip code, deserves the same high-quality education, mn comeback has become a growing movement of philanthropists, community leaders and education…

—
12
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kennedy King Memorial Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
10/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $634,237 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGOKINGDOM OF LIFE CHURCH: $193,988 · OtherKINGDOM OF LIFE CHURCHDEWEY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE: $85,190 · OtherDEWEY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCELawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $75,000 · OtherLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under LawCoalition of Minority Football Coaches: $50,000 · Other+23 more: $177,604 · Other+23 moreMARCH OF DIMES INC: $37,500 · HealthTEAMSMILE INC: $15,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON CONNECTION: $6,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBEARS CARE: $36,213 · PhilanthropyTRUE STAR FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureUNITING VOICES: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT SUCCESS: $17,000 · EducationEDINA GIVE AND GO: $5,000 · EducationPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EducationKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationLawyer Lend-A-Hand to Youth: $10,000 · Human ServicesBLANKETS OF HOPE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesThe Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,216,019Health$65,000Philanthropy$36,213Arts & Culture$34,500Education$29,500Human Services$12,000Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCoalition of Minority Football Coaches: $50,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEARS CARE: $36,213 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS: $17,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEAMSMILE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLawyer Lend-A-Hand to Youth: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPINK RIBBON CONNECTION: $6,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetEDINA GIVE AND GO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENERATING INCOME FOR TOMORROW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKENNEDY KING MEMORIAL INITIATIVE: $3,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANKETS OF HOPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIKE ZIMMER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kevin & Greta Warren Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kevin & Greta Warren Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kevin & Greta Warren Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph