Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$591k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.4MArts & Culture$765kYouth Development$319kHuman Services$225kEducation$132kFood & Nutrition$100kReligion$9kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $437k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$150,000
FAIRCHILD BOTANICAL TROPICAL GARDEN$90,000
COCONUT GROVE CARES$90,000
WATERFALL ARTS$57,000
KIDS ON POINT$50,000
LINCOLNVILLE COMMUNITY LIBRARY$30,000
TREKKERS$30,000
MERRY SPRING NATURE CENTER$25,000
LONG LIVE DYLAN$25,000
MISSION PENIEL$10,000
LINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$10,000
UNITED CHRISTIAN CHURCH$9,000
LINCOLNVILLE HILLS PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $289k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $90k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $60k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $40k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $37k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $32k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $20k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 18 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$3.4M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+92%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $765k · revenue +167%
  • WA
    WATERFALL ARTS
    6× · 2017–2025 · $457k · revenue +1%
  • KO
    KIDS ON POINT INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $210k · revenue +393%

Funded once

  • FT
    FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDE
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • UA
    UNITED ARTS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • FC
    FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Mounts Botanical Garden Inc

Mission: to inspire and educate through nature.vision: we envision our public garden as a nationally acclaimed attraction for residents and visitors alike. its cultural, social and educational activities will draw attendees to enjoy,…

Environment
2
Phillip and Patricia Frost Museum of Science Inc

Frost science inspires and connects people of all ages and backgrounds to enjoy science and technology, and to better understand ourselves and our world.

Arts & Culture
3
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Inc

Phipps' mission is to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants, to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research, and to celebrate its historic glasshouse.

Environment
4
Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden Inc

Mission - we connect people to plants by inspiring communities to explore and conserve nature.our commitments - organizational sustainability, environmental resiliency, collaboration and gathering, social responsibilityour vision - we are…

Environment
5
Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc

The mission of the center is to instill a life-long respect and affection for nature in all people through research and education; to advance a scientific and public understanding of our coastal ecosystems and the need to protect them; and…

Environment
6
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
7
Friends of South Louisiana Wetlands

The mission of south la wetlands discovery center is to revolutionize the way we think, teach, and learn about louisianas disappearing coast. we are currently raising funds to further our mission.

Arts & Culture
8
Lowell Farm and Wildlife Center
Animals
9
Lancaster County Conservancy

The mission of the lancaster county conservancy is "providing wild and forested lands and clean waterways for our community forever". the charitable purposes of the lancaster county conservancy include preservation of natural lands,…

Environment
10
Hancock County Trustees of Public Reservation

Woodlawn nurtures curiosity and a sense of place by promoting downeastmaine's cultural heritage through educational and recreational experiences. under the governance of the hancock county trustees of public reservations, woodlawn offers…

Arts & Culture
11
Cook Museum of Natural Science
Arts & Culture
12
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lincolnville Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $765,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INCFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $173,000 · EnvironmentFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GA…LINCOLNVILLE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $162,000 · OtherLINCOLNVILLE COMMUNITY…MERRY SPRING NATURE CENTER: $150,000 · OtherMERRY SPRING NATURE CE…LINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $129,000 · OtherLINCOLNVILLE HISTORICA…FAIRCHILD BOTANICAL TROPICAL GARDEN: $110,000 · OtherFAIRCHILD BOTANICAL TR…FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDE: $60,000 · OtherFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOT…UNITED ARTS COUNCIL: $35,000 · Other+5 more: $59,500 · Other+5 moreWATERFALL ARTS: $457,000 · Arts & CultureWATERFALL ARTSFRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM: $201,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF LC BATES M…CYPRESS COVE LANDKEEPERS INC: $415,000 · AnimalsCYPRESS COVE …KIDS ON POINT INC: $210,020 · Recreation & SportsKIDS ON POIN…TREKKERS INC: $189,000 · Recreation & SportsTREKKERS INCCOCONUT GROVE CARES INC: $289,000 · Human ServicesCOCONUT G…HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $110,000 · Food & NutritionLONG LIVE DYLAN INC: $38,000 · Education
Environment$938,000Other$705,500Arts & Culture$658,500Animals$415,000Recreation & Sports$399,020Human Services$289,000Food & Nutrition$110,000Education$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $765,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetWATERFALL ARTS: $457,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetCYPRESS COVE LANDKEEPERS INC: $415,000 over 4y, 76% of budgetCOCONUT GROVE CARES INC: $289,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC: $210,020 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM: $201,500 over 7y, 64% of budgetTREKKERS INC: $189,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $173,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $129,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLONG LIVE DYLAN INC: $38,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetFRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERFALL ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CYPRESS COVE LANDKEEPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COCONUT GROVE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds TREKKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds LONG LIVE DYLAN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Davis Family FoundationME13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Davis Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kendel H Kennedy’s filings →

More from the funding graph