Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$1.4MArts & Culture$765kYouth Development$319kHuman Services$225kEducation$132kFood & Nutrition$100kReligion$9kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY$35,000
KIDS ON POINT$25,000
LINCOLNVILLE COMMUNITY LIBRARY$25,000
FAIRCHILD BOTANICAL TROPICAL GARDEN$20,000
TREKKERS$20,000
MERRY SPRING NATURE CENTER$10,000
COCONUT GROVE CARES$10,000
LONG LIVE DYLAN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $60k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $40k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $37k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $32k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $20k → 15%COCONUT GROVE CARES: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 14 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$2.8M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+48%

Still filing today

71%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $615k · revenue +167%
  • WA
    WATERFALL ARTS
    5× · 2017–2023 · $400k · revenue +1%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2023 · $202k · revenue +123% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • FT
    FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDE
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • UA
    UNITED ARTS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • FC
    FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

2
Lewis Ginter Botanical Garden Inc

Mission - we connect people to plants by inspiring communities to explore and conserve nature.our commitments - organizational sustainability, environmental resiliency, collaboration and gathering, social responsibilityour vision - we are…

Environment
3
Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc

The mission of the center is to instill a life-long respect and affection for nature in all people through research and education; to advance a scientific and public understanding of our coastal ecosystems and the need to protect them; and…

Environment
4
Friends of South Louisiana Wetlands

The mission of south la wetlands discovery center is to revolutionize the way we think, teach, and learn about louisianas disappearing coast. we are currently raising funds to further our mission.

Arts & Culture
5
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified
6
Lowell Farm and Wildlife Center
Animals
7
Lancaster County Conservancy

The mission of the lancaster county conservancy is "providing wild and forested lands and clean waterways for our community forever". the charitable purposes of the lancaster county conservancy include preservation of natural lands,…

Environment
8
Cook Museum of Natural Science
Arts & Culture
9
Landcraft Garden Foundation Inc

To inspire and promote gardening and horticulture and the preservation of the environment; to provide a horticulturally diverse garden that offers knowledge of the plant world and acts as a laboratory for experimenting with horticultural…

Environment
10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
12
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lincolnville Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $615,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INCFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $173,000 · EnvironmentFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GAR…WATERFALL ARTS — $400,000 · Arts & CultureWATERFALL ARTSFRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM — $201,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF LC BATES MUS…LINCOLNVILLE COMMUNITY LIBRARY — $132,000 · OtherLINCOLNVILLE COMMUNI…MERRY SPRING NATURE CENTER — $125,000 · OtherMERRY SPRING NATURE …LINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $119,000 · OtherLINCOLNVILLE HISTORI…FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDE — $60,000 · OtherFAIRCHILD TROPICAL B…UNITED ARTS COUNCIL — $35,000 · OtherUNITED ARTS COUNCILFAIRCHILD BOTANICAL TROPICAL GARDEN — $20,000 · Other+5 more — $35,500 · Other+5 moreCYPRESS COVE LANDKEEPERS INC — $415,000 · AnimalsCYPRESS COVE LA…KIDS ON POINT INC — $160,020 · Recreation & SportsKIDS ON POIN…TREKKERS INC — $159,000 · Recreation & SportsTREKKERS INCCOCONUT GROVE CARES INC — $199,000 · Human ServicesHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionLONG LIVE DYLAN INC — $13,000 · Education
Environment$788,000Arts & Culture$601,500Other$526,500Animals$415,000Recreation & Sports$319,020Human Services$199,000Food & Nutrition$100,000Education$13,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $615,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCYPRESS COVE LANDKEEPERS INC — $415,000 over 4y, 76% of budgetWATERFALL ARTS — $400,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetFRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM — $201,500 over 7y, 64% of budgetCOCONUT GROVE CARES INC — $199,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $173,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC — $160,020 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetTREKKERS INC — $159,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetLINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $119,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLONG LIVE DYLAN INC — $13,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetFRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds CYPRESS COVE LANDKEEPERS INC
  • Who funds WATERFALL ARTS
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LC BATES MUSEUM
  • Who funds COCONUT GROVE CARES INC
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC
  • Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC
  • Who funds TREKKERS INC
  • Who funds LINCOLNVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds LONG LIVE DYLAN INC
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Davis Family FoundationME13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Davis Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc4% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kendel H Kennedy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph