Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kelye and Cynthia Stites Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$434kYouth Development$289kReligion$205kHealth$63kCrime & Legal$60kInternational$25kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASS CHURCH$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$50,000
THE GATEHOUSE$25,000
NEW HORIZONS OF NORTH TEXAS$20,000
COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$15,000
MATT HARBIN FOUNDATION$5,000
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $40k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $30k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $30k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $15k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+173%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $202k · revenue +24% · 85% of their budget
  • GB
    GOD BEHIND BARS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +59%
  • NI
    NHNTX INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TJ
    The Junior League of Houston Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +173%
  • SB
    SIVELLS BEND CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • G2
    GUZMAN 23
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
2
Clc Ministries International

To make evangelical Christian literature available to all nations so that people may come to faith and maturity in Jesus Christ

—
3
Global Childrens Network

The purpose of Global Childrens Network is to provide training, ministry resources and networking opportunities to equip church leaders & parents around the world as they lead children & youth to follow Jesus as next generation disciples…

—
4
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
5
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
6
A Child's Wish of Louisiana Inc

To grant wishes to and otherwise act for the benefit of children suffering from terminal or life theatening illness or disease.

—
7
How Center

The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.

—
8
City Church Network of Arkansas

CityChurch Network is a multi-denominational, multi-ethnic, relational network of churches working together for the good of our cities through extraordinary prayer, leader equipping, and collective impact

Religion
9
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
10
Children's Hope International Foundation

Homes, health, and hope for children in need. to specifically deal with meeting the many needs of those orphaned children left behind.

—
11
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
12
Coffe Un Limited
Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Enrichment Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wishes Wonders and Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $233,875 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $201,800 · OtherTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATIONCOMPASS CHURCH: $180,205 · OtherCOMPASS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $67,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more: $47,157 · Other+10 moreCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRICHMEN…CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF THE NAT…GOD BEHIND BARS INC: $60,000 · ReligionGOD BEHIND BA…NHNTX INC: $55,132 · ReligionNHNTX INCLAUNCH GLOBAL: $19,200 · ReligionLAUNCH GLOBALWISHES WONDERS AND KIDS: $55,000 · HealthThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$730,037Human Services$190,000Religion$134,332Health$55,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $201,800 over 8y, 85% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $165,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNHNTX INC: $55,132 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetWISHES WONDERS AND KIDS: $55,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $19,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds NHNTX INC ↗
  • Who funds WISHES WONDERS AND KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds The Junior League of Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kelye and Cynthia Stites Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kelye and Cynthia Stites Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kelye and Cynthia Stites Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph