Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kelye and Cynthia Stites Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$434kYouth Development$289kReligion$205kHealth$63kCrime & Legal$60kInternational$25kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASS CHURCH$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$50,000
THE GATEHOUSE$25,000
NEW HORIZONS OF NORTH TEXAS$20,000
COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$15,000
MATT HARBIN FOUNDATION$5,000
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $10k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $40k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $30k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $30k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $15k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+173%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $202k · revenue +24% · 85% of their budget
  • GB
    GOD BEHIND BARS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +59%
  • NI
    NHNTX INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TJ
    The Junior League of Houston Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +173%
  • SB
    SIVELLS BEND CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • G2
    GUZMAN 23
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

2
Clc Ministries International

To make evangelical Christian literature available to all nations so that people may come to faith and maturity in Jesus Christ

3
Global Childrens Network

The purpose of Global Childrens Network is to provide training, ministry resources and networking opportunities to equip church leaders & parents around the world as they lead children & youth to follow Jesus as next generation disciples…

4
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
5
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
6
A Child's Wish of Louisiana Inc

To grant wishes to and otherwise act for the benefit of children suffering from terminal or life theatening illness or disease.

7
How Center

The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.

8
City Church Network of Arkansas

CityChurch Network is a multi-denominational, multi-ethnic, relational network of churches working together for the good of our cities through extraordinary prayer, leader equipping, and collective impact

Religion
9
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
10
Children's Hope International Foundation

Homes, health, and hope for children in need. to specifically deal with meeting the many needs of those orphaned children left behind.

11
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
12
Coffe Un Limited
Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Enrichment Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wishes Wonders and Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $233,875 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION — $201,800 · OtherTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATIONCOMPASS CHURCH — $180,205 · OtherCOMPASS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $67,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more — $47,157 · Other+10 moreCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $165,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRICHMEN…CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS — $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF THE NAT…GOD BEHIND BARS INC — $60,000 · ReligionGOD BEHIND BA…NHNTX INC — $55,132 · ReligionNHNTX INCLAUNCH GLOBAL — $19,200 · ReligionLAUNCH GLOBALWISHES WONDERS AND KIDS — $55,000 · HealthThe Junior League of Houston Inc — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$730,037Human Services$190,000Religion$134,332Health$55,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION — $201,800 over 8y, 85% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $165,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNHNTX INC — $55,132 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetWISHES WONDERS AND KIDS — $55,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL — $19,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds GOD BEHIND BARS INC
  • Who funds NHNTX INC
  • Who funds WISHES WONDERS AND KIDS
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL
  • Who funds The Junior League of Houston Inc
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kelye and Cynthia Stites Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2022
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph