· Private foundation
Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k20 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY TEXARKANA | $47,500 |
| TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $23,000 |
| LIFEWISE ACADEMY | $23,000 |
| CASA OF NORTHEAST TEXAS | $11,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| WTAMU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TCU FROG CLUB | $10,000 |
| HAVEN HOMES | $6,350 |
| RESTORATION OF HOPE | $6,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| CHRISTUS ST MICHAEL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WACHA FAMILY & FRIENDS | $5,000 |
| CADDO AREA COUNCIL BSA | $5,000 |
| TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–26, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2026, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC10× · 2017–2026 · $156k · revenue +271%
- HOHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA8× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +7%
- OIOPPORTUNITIES INC7× · 2018–2026 · $62k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- AGARKANSAS GAME AND FISHone grant, 2025 · $10k
- WTWEST TEXAS A&M FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
- SCSHILOH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).
Texas Christian Foundations mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and educating Texans on ways their generosity can impact their community, Texas and the world.
The organization cultivates loyalty, tradition, service, and lifelong relationships. supporting and assisting in the development and increasing of the facilities of texas tech university through (1) encourage & establish scholarships, (2)…
The primary purpose of the University of Arkansas Hope - Texarkana Foundation is to advance higher education by securing private financial support for all units and activities of the University of Arkansas Hope Texarkana.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.
The Foundation's purpose is to build inspiration and leadership to enhance and protect Texas' unique culture and environment for the benefit of future generations. The goals of the Foundation are: to expand and enhance architectural…
Texas Society of Architects is the voice for Texas architecture, supporting the creation of safe, beautiful, sustainable environments.
For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi
The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…
Promote the restaurant industry
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Main Street Texarkana Business Organization for a New Downtown. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds CLAY EICHLER MEMORIAL FUND ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS St Michael Foundation ↗
- Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WATERSPRINGS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Randy Sams Outreach Shelter ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET TEXARKANA BUSINESS ORGANIZATION FOR A NEW DOWNTOWN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ledwell Family Foundation · Patterson Troike Foundation Inc · Cabe Cook Foundation · The Bobbie a Atkinson Foundation · Vasco McCoy Jr Foundation · Wayne H Garrison Charitable Tr · The Morriss Family Foundation · Yates Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc · Horace C Cabe Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.