Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kejr Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$592kEducation$104kInternational$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UBSI$70,349
BRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION$21,500
CENTRAL MISSIONARY CLEARINGHOUSE$19,800
MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC$16,400
THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM)$16,200
CROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION$16,000
SIM - SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION$13,900
Individual grant recipient$8,500
AVANT MINISTRIES$8,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$8,000
WILBERFORCE ACADEMY$7,600
MISSION EURASIA$5,200
NOVO$5,000
WORLD IMPACT$4,400
WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP$4,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 77% of grant dollars ($891k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($271k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WILBERFORCE ACADEMY: $9k → 14%WORLD IMPACT: $6k → 14%WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $6k → 13%NOVO: $5k → 20%CROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION: $18k → 15%AVANT MINISTRIES: $10k → 8%MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $18k → 9%MISSION ERASIA: $5k → 7%BRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION: $22k → 11%LAST FRONTIER: $9k → 14%WILBERFORCE ACADEMY: $9k → 14%WORLD IMPACT: $6k → 14%WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $6k → 13%CROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION: $16k → 15%AVANT MINISTRIES: $10k → 8%MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $18k → 9%MISSION ERASIA: $5k → 7%BRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION: $22k → 11%LAST FRONTIER: $9k → 14%WILBERFORCE ACADEMY: $8k → 14%WORLD IMPACT: $6k → 14%WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $6k → 13%CROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION: $16k → 15%AVANT MINISTRIES: $9k → 8%MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $16k → 9%MISSION EURASIA: $5k → 7%BRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION: $22k → 11%LAST FRONTIER: $9k → 14%WILBERFORCE ACADEMY: $8k → 14%WORLD IMPACT: $6k → 14%WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $5k → 13%CROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION: $16k → 15%AVANT MINISTRIES: $8k → 8%MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $16k → 9%MISSION ERASIA: $5k → 7%BRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION: $22k → 11%LAST FRONTIER: $9k → 14%WILBERFORCE ACADEMY: $8k → 14%CROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION: $16k → 15%AVANT MINISTRIES: $8k → 8%MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $16k → 9%BRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION: $21k → 11%LAST FRONTIER: $7k → 14%THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM): $16k → 7%THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM): $15k → 7%THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM): $15k → 7%THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM): $15k → 7%THE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM): $15k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
NC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 23% of all-years giving ($271k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Congo (Kinshasa)$271k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Kejr Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 2% of the giving stays in KS; by stated purpose, 0%.

Kejr Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 27 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$3k

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $99k · revenue +40%
  • WI
    WILBERFORCE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +27%
  • WO
    WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • C
    CHRISTAR
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL GOSPEL MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
3
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
7
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
8
Global Mobilization Ministries Inc

To support christian ministries throughout the world

Religion
9
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
10
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
11
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
12
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation; the most unlike its peers is Global Fellowship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UBSI: $270,597 · OtherUBSIBRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSION: $107,000 · OtherBRAZIL GOSPEL FELLOWSHIP MISSIONCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $98,500 · OtherCentral Missionary Clearinghouse IncCROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATION: $81,100 · OtherCROSSROADS GOSPEL ASSOCIATIONTHE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM): $77,000 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE (TEAM)SIM - SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION: $66,800 · OtherSIM - SUDAN INTERIOR MISSIONAVANT MINISTRIES: $44,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $42,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $41,100 · Other+13 more: $127,300 · Other+13 moreWILBERFORCE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE: $40,000 · ReligionWILBERFORCE…WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC: $26,800 · ReligionWORD OF LIF…MISSION EURASIA: $22,800 · ReligionMISSION EUR…GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $13,000 · ReligionGLOBAL FELL…COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $7,500 · ReligionCOMMISSION …Forum of Christian Leaders: $7,200 · ReligionForum of Ch…+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionMAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $85,600 · EducationENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $1,000 · International
Other$955,797Religion$119,300Education$85,600International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $98,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC: $85,600 over 5y, 14% of budgetWILBERFORCE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetWORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC: $26,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $22,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SCHOLARS: $17,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetForum of Christian Leaders: $7,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORNING STAR MINISTRY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAGAZINE TRAINING INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILBERFORCE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
  • Who funds Forum of Christian Leaders ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MORNING STAR MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Tyndale House Ministries · Word & Deed Foundation of IMMI Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · From His Hand Foundation · The Chatlos Foundation Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kejr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kejr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kejr Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kejr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kejr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph