Skip to content

· Public charity

Keiro Services

Keiro's mission is to enhance the quality of senior life in our community.

$5.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$5.0MFood & Nutrition$583kHuman Services$516kArts & Culture$255kReligion$239kHealth$30kCommunity Improvement$15kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $150k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
  • $250k+1 grant · $5.0M
$8,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$111M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEIRO KIKYO HOME INC$5,001,313
LITTLE TOKYO NUTRITION SERVICES$20,000
LITTLE TOKYO COMMUNITY COUNCIL$15,000
VENICE JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC$14,688
VENICE HONGWANJI BUDDHIST TEMPLE$12,000
CERRITOS BAPTIST CHURCH$10,600
ORANGE COUNTY FRIENDSHIP CHOIR$10,500
ORANGE COUNTY BUDDHIST CHURCH$10,250
PASADENA NIKKEI SENIORS$10,000
LONG BEACH BUDDHIST CHURCH$10,000
LONG BEACH JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER$9,775
KANSAI CLUB$9,600
ZENSHUJI SOTO MISSION$9,500
UNION CHURCH OF LOS ANGELES$9,000
GARDENA VALLEY JAPANESE CULTURAL INSTITUTE$8,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $18k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $17k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $14k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $13k → 10%ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $12k → 10%SEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS' CLUB: $10k → 14%ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $11k → 10%SEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS' CLUB: $10k → 14%HEARTS OF LAVENDER: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 35 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
11

Total granted

$1.5M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+12%

Still filing today

31%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    Little Tokyo Nutrition Services
    7× · 2019–2025 · $104k · revenue +123%
  • ES
    EAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $101k · revenue +230%
  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $93k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAN FERNANDO VALLEY HONGWANJI BUDDHIST TEMPLE
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • CU
    CHATSWORTH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • OA
    OKINAWA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
2
Long Beach Japanese Language School

Classes in the Japanese Language

Education
3
San Fernando Valley Japanese Language Institute

To provide japanese language education and cultural instructions; sharing of facilities with other non-profit organizations.

Education
4
Goen Senior Center Corporation

Improve well-being of local japanese american seniors

Human Services
5
Urasenke Tea Society of So Calif Urasenke Tankokai Los Angeles Assoc

Maintain & Promote Japanese Tea Ceremony

Arts & Culture
6
Long Island Japanese Culture Association Inc

To promote and preserve Japanese culture and heritage by providing educational programs, cultural workshops, language classes, and public events that foster cross-cultural understanding and community engagement, with a focus on communities…

Arts & Culture
7
United Japanese Society of Hawaii

Perpetuate Japanese culture in the State of Hawaii.

Arts & Culture
8
Hollywood Japanese Cultural Institute

The organization was established as a cultural community center, japanese language school, and judo school. the organization may approve, promote, engage in, sponsor, or coordinate any other japanese cultural activities in the hollywood…

Arts & Culture
9
Japanese American Bar Association

To provide support and foster growth of the japanese american legal profession

—
10
Japanese American Citizens League Silicon Valley Chapter

The Japanese American Citizens League is a national organization whose ongoing mission is to secure and maintain the civil rights of Japanese Americans and all others who are victimized by injustice and bigotry. The leaders and members of…

—
11
The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association
Human Services
12
Nikkei for Civil Rights and Redress

To initiate and participate in activities that will promote the history, culture and social welfare of the japanese american community in southern california.this includes education about the world war ii incarceration of japanese american.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Fernando Valley Japanese-American Community Center; the most unlike its peers is Hearts of Lavender Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEIRO KIKYO HOME INC: $5,001,313 · Housing & ShelterKEIRO KIKYO HOME INCBUDDHIST CHURCHES OF AMERICA: $103,250 · OtherBUDDHIST CHURCHES O…Long Beach Japanese Cultural Center: $85,833 · OtherLong Beach Japanese…VENICE JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $83,747 · OtherVENICE JAPANESE COM…CERRITOS BAPTIST CHURCH: $73,825 · OtherCERRITOS BAPTIST CH…PASADENA NIKKEI SENIORS INC: $65,550 · OtherPASADENA NIKKEI SEN…VENICE HONGWANJI BUDDHIST TEMPLE: $64,500 · OtherVENICE HONGWANJI BU…LONG BEACH BUDDHIST CHURCH: $59,404 · OtherBUDDHIST CHURCHES OF AMERICA: $56,895 · OtherZENSHUJI SOTO MISSION: $56,637 · OtherFAITH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $51,500 · OtherWEST LOS ANGELES BUDDHIST TEMPLE: $46,495 · Other+28 more: $405,504 · Other+28 moreEAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100,800 · Arts & CultureGARDENA VALLEY JAPANESE CULTURAL INSTITUTE: $81,398 · Arts & CultureGO FOR BROKE NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $21,100 · Arts & CultureMAKOTO TAIKO: $15,840 · Arts & CultureOKINAWA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $6,500 · Arts & CultureORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $92,622 · Human ServicesSEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB INC: $20,100 · Human ServicesHearts of Lavender Inc: $8,400 · Human ServicesLittle Tokyo Nutrition Services: $104,400 · Food & NutritionLITTLE TOKYO COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA: $15,000 · Social ScienceCALIFORNIA BLACK MEDIA: $6,850 · Civil Rights
Housing & Shelter$5,001,313Other$1,153,140Arts & Culture$237,638Human Services$121,122Food & Nutrition$104,400Community Improvement$15,000Social Science$15,000Civil Rights$6,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEIRO KIKYO HOME INC: $5,001,313 over 1y, 99% of budgetLittle Tokyo Nutrition Services: $104,400 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetEAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $100,800 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $92,622 over 7y, 19% of budgetLong Beach Japanese Cultural Center: $85,833 over 7y, 40% of budgetVENICE JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $83,747 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetGARDENA VALLEY JAPANESE CULTURAL INSTITUTE: $81,398 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetGO FOR BROKE NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $21,100 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB INC: $20,100 over 2y, 24% of budgetSAN FERNANDO VALLEY JAPANESE-AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $19,900 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPasadena Buddhist Temple: $17,329 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetMAKOTO TAIKO: $15,840 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLITTLE TOKYO COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetVISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA: $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOKINAWA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetGRATEFUL CRANE ENSEMBLE INC: $6,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEIRO KIKYO HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Tokyo Nutrition Services ↗
  • Who funds EAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Long Beach Japanese Cultural Center ↗
  • Who funds VENICE JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDENA VALLEY JAPANESE CULTURAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GO FOR BROKE NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FERNANDO VALLEY JAPANESE-AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Buddhist Temple ↗
  • Who funds MAKOTO TAIKO ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE TOKYO COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds OKINAWA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Japanese Home for the AgedCA39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 9 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Japanese Home for the Aged · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Ja Community Foundation · Df Foundation · California Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Keiro Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keiro Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Keiro Services?

    Find your warmest path to Keiro Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Keiro Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph