How much did JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED grant in FY2018?

JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED reported 28 grants totaling $507,447 in its FY2018 IRS filing.

Where is JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED based?

JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED is based in CA.

JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED

Keiro's mission is to enhance the quality of senior life in our community.

$507k

Granted FY2018

Grants

Communities

$40k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2018 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

Under $10k9 grants · $63k
$10k–50k19 grants · $385k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

NIKKEI SENIOR GARDENS$40,000
JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM$39,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ALTADENA$30,000
LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$30,000
JAPANESE AMERICAN CULTURAL & COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
ORANGE COUNTY JAPANESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S GREATER LOS ANGELES$25,000
EAST SAN GABRIEL VALLEY JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
SEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB$20,000
JAPANESE COMMUNITY PIONEER CENTER$17,000
GO FOR BROKE NATIONAL EDUCATION CENTER$16,900
ORANGE COUNTY BUDDHIST CHURCH$16,500
LITTLE TOKYO NUTRITION SERVICES$16,000
OPICA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC$10,000
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY JAPANESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Japantown Cultural Society

Education

Japanese Cultural Center of Hawaii

To preserve japanese american history and promote the japanese culture in hawaii for future generations.

Arts & Culture

Venice Japanese Community Center Inc

To preserve, share and promote the japanese and japanese american culture and heritage and provide for the needs of the japanese american community through education.

—

Goen Senior Center Corporation

Improve wellbeing of local japanese american seniors

Human Services

Brooklyn Japanese American Family

Teaching and seminars

Arts & Culture

The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association

Human Services

Genryu Arts

The mission of genryu arts is to present and participate in japanese american culture through taiko (japanese drumming) and other traditional and contemporary music and dance forms.

Arts & Culture

Asian American Senior Citizens Service

To provide educational and employment services to the seniors of asian communities.

—

Japanese American Cultural Center

To promote and foster the understanding anda appreciation of japanese and japanes-american art, history, and culture to preserve and disseminate information about the japanese-american way of life to promote the study of the japanese…

Arts & Culture

The Japanese American Association

Please see organization's mission on Schedule O.

—

Nikkei for Civil Rights and Redress

To initiate and participate in activities that will promote the history, culture and social welfare of the japanese american community in southern california.this includes education about the world war ii incarceration of japanese american.

Unclassified

So Calif Gardeners' Federation Inc

Organization of professional associations for the promotion and education of the profession

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Japanese Community Pioneer and the most unlike its peers is Okinawa Association of America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/25

the rest of the field

13%

6,641/49,791

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

15/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Arts & Culture$145,900Other$136,908Housing & Shelter$70,000Human Services$55,000Health$25,000Food & Nutrition$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Keiro ServicesCA37.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Keiro Services · Ja Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Asian Pacific Community Fund Of · Sempra Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~51 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 953194613 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SEINAN SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 51 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 43% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Japanese Home for the Aged?

Find your warmest path to Japanese Home for the Aged through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Japanese Home for the Aged?

More from the funding graph

JAPANESE HOME FOR THE AGED

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Japanese Home for the Aged?

More from the funding graph