Skip to content
Keim Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Keim Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
$1,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BETH EL$28,004
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY$18,765
ANIMAL WELFARE ASSN$2,798
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY$1,800
BANCROFT$1,500
THE ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER PHILADELPHIA CHAPTER$1,034
MISSION MSA$546
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BANCROFT: $10k → 7%BANCROFT: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 3 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$89k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+30%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH EL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $73k
  • BA
    BANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +8%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • ML
    MARJORIE & LEWIS KATZ JCC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • ED
    ESF DREAM CAMP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • JF
    JAFCO FAMILY MATTERS
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Answer Als

To find solutions for people living with als now and for the future by utilizing knowledge of patients, leading researchers and technology to seek immediate solutions to improve the lives of those living with als until a treatment or cure…

Health
2
Als One Inc

The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…

Health
3
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association St Louis Regional Chapter

To discover treatments and a cure for als, and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.

—
4
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assoc Tennessee Chapter

The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis association's mission is to raise money to assist in finding a cure for als and to improve the lifestyle of those who have als.

—
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associatio Evergreen Chapter

Leading the fight to treat and cure ALS through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with Lou Gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

—
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn

The mission of the als association is to make als livable and cure it.

Health
9
I Am Als

The mission of i am als is to accelerate a cure for als by mobilizing collective power to drive urgent policy and systems change.

Health
10
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associationiowa Chapter

Leading the fight to treat and cure als through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with lou gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

—
11
Als Association Western Pennsylvania Chapter

To assist people with ALS and their families by providing compassionate care and support, and to support research efforts.

—
12
Als United Greater New York Inc

To support & empower the als community through a collaborative approach to fostering bold research initiatives, advancing national and state advocacy, & providing comprehensive care to individuals & families affected by als.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bancroft a New Jersey Non Profit Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Animal Welfare Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH EL: $73,101 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ELMARJORIE & LEWIS KATZ JCC: $6,350 · OtherMARJORIE & LEWIS KATZ JCC+1 more: $1,030 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $32,280 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH…BANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $11,500 · Human ServicesBANCROFT …ESF DREAM CAMP FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC: $3,900 · Youth DevelopmentA LEG TO STAND ON INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $2,798 · AnimalsALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $1,034 · HealthMISSION MSA: $546 · HealthEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $540 · HealthALS Hope Foundation: $520 · Health
Other$80,481Philanthropy$32,280Human Services$11,500Youth Development$9,900Animals$2,798Health$2,640

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $32,280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESF DREAM CAMP FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMDEN COUNTY INC: $3,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $2,798 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $1,034 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LEG TO STAND ON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION MSA: $546 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS Hope Foundation: $520 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ravitz Family Foundat…Investors Foundation …Chubb Charitable Foun…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ravitz Family FoundationNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ravitz Family Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Keim Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keim Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Keim Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home