Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kehl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$262k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$750kReligion$251kHuman Services$74kRecreation & Sports$66kYouth Development$46kPhilanthropy$38kFood & Nutrition$32kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST COLUMBKILLE SCHOOL$250,000
DUBUQUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$7,000
NORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY PANTRY$5,000
DUBUQUE FOOD PANTRY$200
SALVATION ARMY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $43k → 9%RED CROSS: $31k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$864k · 7 repeat orgs$492k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$864k
$237k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+38%

Still filing today

14%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $500k
  • SC
    ST COLUMBKILLE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k
  • DB
    DUBUQUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k

Funded once

  • ML
    MIRACLE LEAGUE OF DUBUQUE
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -94%
  • HA
    HAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $43k · revenue +72%
  • H
    HACAP
    one grant, 2020 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medical Associates Foundation of Dubuque
—
2
Greater Des Moines Partnership Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Iowa Lutheran Hospital Auxiliary

To promote and advance activities beneficial to iowa lutheran hospital.

Health
4
The Dubuque Visiting Nurse Association

The visiting nurse association exists to promote and improve the health, wellness, and safety of individuals and communities through provision of comprehensive, home, and community based initiatives and services.

—
5
Finley Health Foundation Inc

The finley health foundation provides financial support to the finley hospital and the dubuque visiting nurse association via ongoing fundraising activities through the cultivation and solicitation of gifts from private individuals and…

Health
6
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
7
Iowa Pharmacy Association Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Iowa Pharmacy Association

Preserve and advance the interests of the profession of pharmacy and to serve the professional needs of member pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, student pharmacists, and pharmacy owners.

Health
9
Mid-Iowa Health Foundation
Religion
10
Family Planning Council of Iowa

The purpose of the family planning council of iowa is to assure access to quality reproductive healthcare and family planning for all people.

Health
11
Iowa Statewide Poison Control Center

To reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with poisonings, through providing statewide 24-hour telephone management, consultation, poison prevention information, public and professional education and research for the people of…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Iowa Physicians Clinic Medical Foundation

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Finley Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Uplift International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $500,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC SCHOOLSST COLUMBKILLE: $250,250 · OtherST COLUMBKILLEST COLUMBKILLE SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherST COLUMBKILLE SCHOOL+9 more: $173,550 · Other+9 moreHAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $42,800 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $31,250 · Human ServicesMIRACLE LEAGUE OF DUBUQUE: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsGOLF FOR INJURED VETERANS EVERYWHERE FOUNDATION: $15,800 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF ST MARY'S: $25,000 · Community ImprovementTHE FINLEY HOSPITAL: $9,500 · HealthNORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY PANTRY: $5,000 · Food & NutritionUPLIFT INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 · International
Other$1,173,800Human Services$74,050Recreation & Sports$65,800Community Improvement$25,000Health$9,500Food & Nutrition$5,000International$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF DUBUQUE: $50,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetHAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $42,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $31,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST MARY'S: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGOLF FOR INJURED VETERANS EVERYWHERE FOUNDATION: $15,800 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetTHE FINLEY HOSPITAL: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY PANTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF DUBUQUE ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEYE AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ST MARY'S ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FOR INJURED VETERANS EVERYWHERE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FINLEY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds DUBUQUE FOOD PANTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Ay McDonald Charitable Foundation · James B & Melita a McDonough Foundation · Dubuque Racing Association Ltd · Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kehl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kehl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kehl Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph