Skip to content

· Private foundation

Keeley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$699k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.5MHealth$108kAnimals$105kHuman Services$88kYouth Development$38kReligion$31kHousing & Shelter$17kPublic Benefit$6kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Depaul University$499,500
Depaul University$105,000
Chicago Zoological Society$50,000
LTHS$10,000
Invest 4 Kids$5,000
Home 2 Home$5,000
First Congregation of Western Springs$5,000
Wolcott Academy$2,500
Old St. Pat's Church$2,500
Marie Joseph Spiritual Center$1,000
Highsight$1,000
Jay's Hope, Children's Cancer Fund$500
Depaul University$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Agape House: $5k → 10%The Community House: $1k → 7%The Community House: $1k → 7%Invest For Kids: $25k → 14%Invest For Kids: $25k → 14%Invest For Kids: $25k → 14%Prairie Trail Federation: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
MI
NY
CT
RI
CA
CO
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 15 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$2.7M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+6%

Still filing today

47%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.5M · revenue +25%
  • Chicago Zoological Society
    4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +43%
  • IF
    Invest for Kids Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LU
    Loyola University Medical
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • TRINITY COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue +31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elizabethtown College

Provide a transformative educational experience that cultivates strengths of its students.

Education
2
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
3
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
4
Lumen Christi Institute

To make the catholic intellectual tradition a vital part of the culture of universities. to enrich academic communities at the university of chicago, across the nation, and the world with the insights of catholic thought. to dialogue with…

—
5
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
6
Trinity Christian College Association

Provide a biblically informed liberal arts education to undergraduate and graduate college students. we strive to offer the highest quality of instruction to prepare students for excellence in further study and careers beyond trinity. all…

Education
7
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Pratt Institute

Pratt is an institute, an experience, and an idea. what started as a radical experiment to expand access to creative careers is now a community of 5,137 grad and undergrad students working across 48 programs with 1,200 dedicated faculty.…

Education
11
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
12
Coe College

Coe college is a private, four-year co-educational liberal arts college.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Urban Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Home 2 Home Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $2,452,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY+3 more: $35,000 · EducationLoyola University Medical: $100,000 · OtherLoyola Un…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividua…Big Shoulders: $25,000 · OtherBig Shoul…Old St Pat's Church: $12,500 · OtherLTHS: $10,000 · OtherFirst Congregation of Western Springs: $10,000 · Other+23 more: $57,200 · Other+23 moreChicago Zoological Society: $105,000 · AnimalsInvest for Kids Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesPRAIRIE TRAIL FEDERATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT: $9,500 · Housing & ShelterHIGHSIGHT: $6,000 · Community ImprovementST ANN ARTS AND CULTURAL CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNEW BUFFALO SHORELINE ALLIANCE: $500 · Environment
Education$2,487,000Other$239,700Animals$105,000Human Services$87,000Housing & Shelter$9,500Community Improvement$6,000Arts & Culture$1,000Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $2,452,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $31,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT: $9,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPRAIRIE TRAIL FEDERATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN SPRINGS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds Invest for Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME 2 HOME PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HIGHSIGHT ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE TRAIL FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLCOTT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST ANN ARTS AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN SPRINGS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BUFFALO SHORELINE ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Keeley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keeley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Keeley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Keeley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $404k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Keeley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph