· Private foundation
Keeley Cares Inc Attn Stacey Kamps
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of KEELEY CARES INC ATTN STACEY KAMPS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $96k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $309k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL | $100,000 |
| WORLD PEDIATRIC PROJECT | $75,000 |
| URBAN LEAGUE | $67,828 |
| PEDAL THE CAUSE | $66,550 |
| GOOD SHEPARD FAMILY SERVICES | $37,190 |
| ST PATRICK CENTER | $27,627 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE | $26,757 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $25,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT | $25,000 |
| EASTER SEALS | $20,500 |
| ST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $14,638 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER | $12,858 |
| ANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI | $10,342 |
| UNITED WAY GREATER ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| AUTISM SPEAKS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $374k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ULURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS4× · 2021–2024 · $362k · revenue +24%
- PTPEDAL THE CAUSE4× · 2021–2024 · $285k · revenue +60%
- WPWORLD PEDIATRICS4× · 2021–2024 · $255k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- CCONCORDANCEone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +10%
- CGCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +196%
- AHAMERICA'S HEARTLAND REMEMBERS INCone grant, 2021 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…
We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…
Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…
The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…
Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Kwame Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
- Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
- Who funds St Louis Police Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORDANCE ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PETER & PAUL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Room at the Inn ↗
- Who funds RIDING FOR A REASON INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Edward Jones Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Berges Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Keeley Cares Inc Attn Stacey Kamps funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Keeley Cares Inc Attn Stacey Kamps?
Find your warmest path to Keeley Cares Inc Attn Stacey Kamps through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.