Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kay Yow Cancer Foundation Inc

The mission of kay yow cancer fund is to be a part of finding an answer in the fight against all cancers affecting women; through raising money for scientific research, assisting the underserved, and unifying people for a common cause.

$750k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$4.6MHuman Services$125k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $550k
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER$150,000
THE V FOUNDATION$100,000
ST LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL$50,000
EQUAL HOPE$50,000
MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER$50,000
SMILOW CANCER HOSPITAL YALE$50,000
ST JOSEPH'SCANDLER FOUNDATIONS$50,000
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$50,000
ST BARNABAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUN$25,000
MULTICARE INLAND NW FOUNDATION$25,000
CEDARS-SINAI ADVANCEMENT$25,000
CARILION CLINIC FOUNDATION$25,000
HAMPTON ROADS CANCER CTR FOUNDATION$25,000
UVA COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$25,000
TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC: $75k → 14%UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 4 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$3.0M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

75%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $575k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +111%
  • TR
    THE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $350k · revenue -13%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $275k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
  • SC
    STEPHENSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • MN
    MOUNT NITTANY HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +251% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
2
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
5
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
9
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
10
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
12
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Candler Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sisters Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE V FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthMOUNT NITTANY HEALTH SYSTEM — $150,000 · HealthCarle Development Foundation — $150,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $150,000 · Health+12 more — $525,000 · Health+12 moreTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 · OtherTHE REX HEALTHCARE …STEPHENSON CANCER CENTER — $150,000 · OtherSTEPHENSON CANCER C…MASONIC CANCER CENTER FUND INC — $100,000 · OtherMASONIC CANCER CENT…SMILOW CANCER HOSPITAL YALE — $50,000 · OtherSMILOW CANCER HOSPI…MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN CANCER INSTITUTE — $50,000 · OtherMEDSTAR GEORGETOWN …HOWARD UNIVERSITY CANCER CENTER — $50,000 · OtherHOWARD UNIVERSITY C…+3 more — $75,000 · Other+3 moreUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 · EducationTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Human Services
Health$3,525,000Other$825,000Education$275,000Human Services$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTHE REX HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT NITTANY HEALTH SYSTEM — $150,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetCarle Development Foundation — $150,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT BARNABAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCANDLER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNAVICENT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEVADA HEALTH CENTERS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM PA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEqual Hope — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSISTERS NETWORK — $50,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Society IncGA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kay Yow Cancer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph