Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kaufman Mayo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$74kReligion$23kEducation$21kCivil Rights$20kCrime & Legal$15kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$9kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$737k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST LONDON SCHOOL$5,000
CARE HOUSE$5,000
MINISTRY OF CARING$4,000
THE WINDWARD SCHOOL$2,500
LOW COUNTRY FOOD BANK$2,000
ST JOSEPH CHURCH$2,000
ST ANN'S CHURCH$1,000
CHRISTIANACARE$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD DE$1,000
TRIDENT SWIM FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Community Help in Park Slope Inc: $3k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $3k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $1k → 20%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$161k · 19 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$161k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+31%

Still filing today

42%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $15k · revenue +44%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $7k · revenue +281%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GATEWAY SCHOOL OF NY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH ON THE BRANDYWINE
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • BB
    BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Delaware Center for Justice

The delaware center for justice, inc. seeks to ensure an effective, efficient, and equitable system of justice in delaware through advocacy, direct services, research and public education.

Crime & Legal
3
Aids Delaware Inc

To eliminate the spread and stigma of hiv/aids, improve the lives of those living with hiv/aids, and promote community health through comprehensive and culturally-sensitive services, education programs and advocacy.

Health
4
Delaware State University

Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…

Education
5
Delaware Bar Foundation

The delaware bar foundation's mission is improving the administration of justice in delaware by: - providing funding for legal services for the poor - promoting study and research in the field of law - fostering knowledge of citizenship…

Crime & Legal
6
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
7
United Way of Delaware

The organization's mission is to maximize the community's resources to improve the quality of lives of all delawareans.

Philanthropy
8
Housing Alliance Delaware

Our mission is to advance housing opportunities, end homelessness, and promote thriving communities for all.

Housing & Shelter
9
Children's Advocacy Center of Delaware

To reduce the devastating long-term effects that child abuse has on children, their families and society through immediate, coordinated, child focused services, education, and advocacy.

Human Services
10
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
11
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
12
Child Inc

To be the leading advocate for delaware's children. we provide creative prevention and treatment programs that meet the changing needs of families. we serve dependent, neglected, and abused children and their parents. we provide programs…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Delaware; the most unlike its peers is National Stuttering Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MINISTRY OF CARING INC: $22,500 · OtherTHE MINISTRY OF CARING INCWEST LONDON ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · OtherWEST LONDON ACTION FOR CHILDRENCARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherCARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTYST JOSEPH CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHPLANNED PARENTHOOD DE: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD DECHRISTIANA CARE: $9,700 · OtherCHRISTIANA CARECOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $9,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INCLOW COUNTRY FOOD BANK: $8,000 · OtherST ANN'S CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherChildren Families First: $6,000 · OtherSIHAF: $6,000 · Other+20 more: $28,240 · Other+20 moreCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $1,300 · Human ServicesDUKE UNIVERSITY: $4,100 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE LIBRARY INC: $1,200 · EducationINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $4,500 · InternationalStehm Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERADELAWARE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,440Crime & Legal$15,000Human Services$7,800Education$5,300International$4,500Housing & Shelter$2,000Arts & Culture$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MINISTRY OF CARING INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStehm Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE LIBRARY INC: $1,200 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERADELAWARE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNational Stuttering Association: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR BOARD OF CHRISTIANA CARE INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MINISTRY OF CARING INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Stehm Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds OPERADELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds National Stuttering Association ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE JUNIOR BOARD OF CHRISTIANA CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delaware Community Foundation IncDE15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kaufman Mayo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kaufman Mayo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • The Ministry of Caring Inc: 30% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Stehm Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Operadelaware Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kaufman Mayo Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kaufman Mayo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaufman Mayo’s filings →

More from the funding graph