Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kathryn O'Keeffe Charitable Foundat

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$145kEducation$58kHealth$50kCivil Rights$14kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE RM$10,000
OFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT$10,000
516 ARTS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SANTE FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SITE SANTA FE: $15k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTN: $10k → 14%ESPANOLA HEALING ARTS: $5k → 18%THE OHIO STATE UNIV FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $9k → 6%GIRLS INC OF SANTA FE: $10k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTN: $5k → 14%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%SANTA FE YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTN: $5k → 14%SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE RM: $10k → 14%SANTA FE YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE RM: $10k → 14%SANTA FE YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $3k → 12%OFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: $26k → 14%VITAL SPACES: $5k → 12%OFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: $25k → 14%516 ARTS: $10k → 14%WHOLE WOMANS HEALTH OF NEW MEXICO: $10k → 14%OFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: $10k → 14%OFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 10 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$212k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+134%

Still filing today

60%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT
    4× · 2019–2025 · $66k · revenue +140% · 26% of their budget
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2018–2022 · $31k · revenue +49%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $16k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SS
    SITE SANTA FEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +65%
  • D4
    DOLLARS 4 SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +134%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Fe Concert Foundation Dba Performance Santa Fe Foundation

To support Santa Fe Concert Association, DBA: Performance Santa Fe

Arts & Culture
2
Santa Fe Pro Musica Inc

Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.

Arts & Culture
3
Santa Fe Youth Symphony Incorporated

Our Mission is to inspire and engage the youth of Northern New Mexico's multicultural communities through excellent music education, the guidance of music professionals, and performance opportunities from small ensemble to full orchestra…

—
4
The Center for Contemporary Arts of Santa Fe Inc

Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…

Arts & Culture
5
The Santa Fe Opera

To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…

Arts & Culture
6
Foundation for the Santa Fe Symphony Orchestra & Chorus Inc

To support and promote the efforts of the santa fe symphony orchestra & chorus inc

—
7
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
8
Santa Fe Jazz Foundation Inc
—
9
Santa Fe Conservation Trust

The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…

Environment
10
Santa Fe Concert Association dba Performance Santa Fe

Performance Santa Fe (PSF) was dedicated to support performing arts by bringing world-class performing artists to Santa Fe and provided excellent arts education to the youth in the community.

—
11
San Juan Symphony

The San Juan Symphony is an innovative regional orchestra that contributes to the cultural enrichment of the diverse communities of the Four Corners area with inspiring live performances and creative, collaborative efforts.

—
12
Institute of Contemporary Art San Diego

to advance regional contemporary art and artists while fostering cultural equity through access to meaningful art experiences

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Site Santa Fe; the most unlike its peers is Ohio State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE RM: $20,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE RMPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTN: $20,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTNIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSANTA FE YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · OtherSANTA FE YOUTH SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIONDOLLARS 4 SCHOOLS: $11,000 · OtherDOLLARS 4 SCHOOLSTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INCWHOLE WOMANS HEALTH OF NEW MEXICO: $10,000 · OtherWHOLE WOMANS HEALTH OF NEW MEXICONATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $9,000 · OtherNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATIONESPANOLA HEALING ARTS: $5,000 · OtherVITAL SPACES: $5,000 · OtherOFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: $66,000 · Arts & CultureOFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECTSITE SANTA FE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSITE SANTA FEQueen Bee Music Association: $11,000 · Arts & CultureQueen Bee Music Association516 Arts: $10,000 · Arts & Culture516 ArtsSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTDPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $31,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN EDUCATIO…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,042 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSIT…SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · EducationSANTA FE ART INSTITU…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$117,500Arts & Culture$112,000Education$52,042Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOFFCENTER COMMUNITY ARTS PROJECT: $66,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $31,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,042 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSITE SANTA FE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetQueen Bee Music Association: $11,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTHE SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & CHORUS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Lannan Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Gale Family Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kathryn O'Keeffe Charitable Foundat funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kathryn O'Keeffe Charitable Foundat. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kathryn O'Keeffe Charitable Foundat?

    Find your warmest path to Kathryn O'Keeffe Charitable Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kathryn O'Keeffe Charitable Foundat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph