Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karuna Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$368kCrime & Legal$170kFood & Nutrition$96kCivil Rights$96kEnvironment$51kHealth$30kEducation$6kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center for Victims of Torture$40,000
Amnesty International USA$20,000
Centurion Ministries$14,000
Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education$14,000
ACLU Foundation of Arizona$13,000
Ashoka Innovators for the Public$12,000
Sedona Recycles$12,000
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance$10,000
Vitamin Angels$6,000
ABA Fund for Justice and Education$5,000
Keep Sedona Beautiful$2,000
Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research$2,000
ACLPI$2,000
Sedona Public Library$1,000
Friends of the Forest Inc$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%MANZANITA OUTREACH: $4k → 14%Center for Victims of Torture: $40k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $25k → 17%PROBAR: $5k → 23%ABA Fund for Justice and Education: $5k → 14%CENTURION MINISTRIES: $14k → 11%ASHOKA INNOVATORS FOR THE PUBLIC: $14k → 7%ARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%MAZANITA OUTREACH: $2k → 14%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $25k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $25k → 17%PROBAR: $5k → 23%AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FUND FOR JUSTICE AND EDUCATION: $5k → 14%Centurion Ministries: $14k → 11%ASHOKA INNOVATORS FOR THE PUBLIC: $12k → 7%ARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%MANZANITA OUTREACH: $2k → 14%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $25k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $25k → 17%PROBAR: $5k → 23%CENTURION MINISTRIES: $14k → 11%ASHOKA INNOVATORS FOR THE PUBLIC: $12k → 7%ARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MANZANITA OUTREACH: $2k → 14%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $25k → 14%Amnesty International USA: $20k → 17%PROBAR: $4k → 23%CENTURION MINISTRIES: $14k → 11%ASHOKA INNOVATORS FOR THE PUBLIC: $12k → 7%ARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%SEDONA RECYCLES: $12k → 14%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $22k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $15k → 17%CENTURION MINISTRIES: $14k → 11%Ashoka Innovators for the Public: $12k → 7%Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education: $14k → 11%Sedona Recycles: $12k → 14%CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $20k → 14%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $15k → 17%CENTURION MINISTRIES: $14k → 11%ASHOKA INNOVATORS FOR THE PUBLIC: $12k → 7%ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%St Mary's Food Bank Alliance: $10k → 11%ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $8k → 11%ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$783k · 17 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$783k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-13%

Still filing today

65%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalFood & NutritionEnvironmentCrime & LegalCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $157k · revenue +23%
  • AF
    ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $84k · revenue +61%
  • CENTURION MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $84k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue -73%
  • AB
    American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona

The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…

—
2
Arizona Solar Energy Industries Assoc

AriSEIAs mission is to develop and support policies that create opportunities to advance Arizonas economy through solar energy and storage. AriSEIA advocates for sustainable job creation in deployment of solar and complementary…

Arts & Culture
3
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
Arizona Association for Justice

Preserve, protect and promote a fair and effective justice system, including the right to trial by jury. protect the health and safety of arizona families. educate the public about consumer and constitutional issues. support the ethical…

—
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
One Arizona

One arizonas mission is to increase civic participation among arizonans

Civil Rights
9
Al Otro Lado

Al otro lado (aol) provides innovative cross-border legal services to refugees, deportees, and other migrantsin tijuana, mexico and throughout throughout the u.s., with a focus on southern california. aol's mission is to uplift immigrant…

Human Services
10
Arizona Forward Association

Arizona Forward brings business and civic leaders together to promote cooperative efforts to improve the environmental sustainability and economic vitality of our state and local regions.

Community Improvement
11
Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project Inc

The florence project provides and coordinates legal services and related social services to indigent men, women, and unaccompanied children detained in arizona for immigration removal proceedings.

Crime & Legal
12
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education; the most unlike its peers is Sedona Recycles Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $125,000 · OtherAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USACENTURION MINISTRIES INC: $84,000 · OtherCENTURION MINISTRIES INCARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $62,000 · OtherARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATIONPROBAR: $19,000 · OtherPROBARKEEP SEDONA BEAUTIFUL INC: $12,000 · OtherACLPI: $12,000 · Other+3 more: $22,000 · Other+3 moreTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $157,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTUREASHOKA: $74,000 · InternationalASHOKAHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $12,000 · InternationalST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $55,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOO…VITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC: $31,000 · Food & NutritionVITAMIN ANGEL…Manzanita Outreach: $10,000 · Food & NutritionManzanita Out…ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $84,000 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDA…SEDONA RECYCLES INC: $32,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR LEGAL SERVICES & EDUCATION: $14,000 · Crime & LegalAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSEDONA PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $6,000 · EducationHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$336,000International$243,000Food & Nutrition$96,000Civil Rights$84,000Environment$33,000Crime & Legal$19,000Education$6,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $157,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $84,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCENTURION MINISTRIES INC: $84,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetASHOKA: $74,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEDONA RECYCLES INC: $32,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetVITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP SEDONA BEAUTIFUL INC: $12,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetManzanita Outreach: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEDONA PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds CENTURION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SEDONA RECYCLES INC ↗
  • Who funds VITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA FOUNDATION FOR LEGAL SERVICES & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP SEDONA BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds Manzanita Outreach ↗
  • Who funds SEDONA PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Solar United Neighbors Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karuna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karuna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Karuna’s filings →

    More from the funding graph