Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kanak & Prabha Golia Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$680k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.6MEducation$708kInternational$560kHealth$107kHuman Services$68kCommunity Improvement$55kPhilanthropy$52kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $226k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHRI NAKODA PARAS BHERAV$250,000
Individual grant recipient$170,627
VEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL$55,501
MANAV MANDIR MISSION$40,100
STONYBROOK SCHOOL$33,596
RAVI AND NAINA FOUNDATION$32,000
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY$26,853
JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA$20,020
ARIHANTA INSTITUTE$10,000
N Y IT$8,317
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ANTIGUA$8,000
CUNYEDU$6,000
SHEOWS CARES FOUNDATION$5,500
JAIN TEMPLE OF NEW YORK$5,148
Individual grant recipient$3,760
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 41% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 59% that went abroad ($2.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BLOSSOM CHARITY: $15k → 7%GLOBAL FUNDS FOR WIDOWS: $1k → 17%THE ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA: $20k → 6%THE ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA: $14k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 59% of all-years giving ($2.8M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$2.8M · 52 grants
Canada$4k · 1 grant
Switzerland$3k · 3 grants
Australia$1k · 2 grants
Austria$253 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 46 repeat orgs$415k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
63

Total granted

$4.3M
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+28%

Still filing today

26%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STONY BROOK SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $133k · revenue +6%
  • NY
    NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $32k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • BABSON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $34k · revenue +18%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2023 · $29k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Hindu University Inc

Our mission as per the by-laws : a) the board adopts a strategic plan that includes goals which will lead to acquiring accreditation recognized by us department of education and maintaining it. this includes getting an accreditation from…

Religion
2
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
3
Swami Dayanand Education Foundation
Education
4
Indian Medical Society of New Jersey Inc
Health
5
American Inst of Indian Studies

Dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about india and the promotion of intellectual engagement with india in american universities by providing research fellowship support, training in indian languages, knowledge of indian culture, and…

Social Science
6
The Friends of Indian School of Business Foundation C/O Nithin Srinivasan
Education
7
University of Spiritual Research
Religion
8
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
9
International Foundation for Social Impact Inc

To promote education in the field of medical, engineering, management, computer software, hardware and information technology by establishing school, college, institution and education and research centre for upliftment of society, with a…

Education
10
Indo American Development and Health Organization
International
11
Southern Asian Public Health Association
Health
12
Sindhi Association of North America
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share and Care Foundation for India; the most unlike its peers is Blossom Charity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRI NAKODA PARAS BHERAV: $1,876,501 · OtherSHRI NAKODA PARAS BHERAVVEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL: $448,825 · OtherVEERAYATAN INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $293,394 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC: $179,988 · Other+87 more: $1,573,093 · Other+87 moreNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $92,129 · EducationBABSON COLLEGE: $33,612 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $31,800 · EducationARIHANTA INSTITUTE: $20,000 · EducationNew England College: $12,359 · EducationST JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $11,639 · EducationWilmington College: $10,254 · Education+3 more: $11,807 · EducationASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA INC: $34,424 · Human ServicesBLOSSOM CHARITY INC: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesNARGIS DUTT MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $27,500 · HealthNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS: $10,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,530 · HealthINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $7,350 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $5,925 · InternationalRaj Saubhag Satsang Mandal USA: $4,500 · InternationalSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $3,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ARCH INC: $2,001 · InternationalGIVE2ASIA: $2,000 · International+1 more: $528 · InternationalSHEOWS CARES FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 · Community ImprovementECHO USA INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,371,801Education$223,600Human Services$50,424Health$41,530International$25,304Community Improvement$16,500Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE STONY BROOK SCHOOL: $133,065 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $92,129 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA INC: $34,424 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $33,612 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $31,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNARGIS DUTT MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetARIHANTA INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSHEOWS CARES FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetBLOSSOM CHARITY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetNew England College: $12,359 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $11,639 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $10,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $7,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $5,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECHO USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRaj Saubhag Satsang Mandal USA: $4,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $3,629 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $3,178 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,530 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGANESH UTSAV NEW YORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $528 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndian American Forum: $500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWORLD VEGAN VISION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINDIA SOCIETY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY INC: $250 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE STONY BROOK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF INDIANS IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NARGIS DUTT MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIHANTA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SHEOWS CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOSSOM CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds New England College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ10.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kanak & Prabha Golia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kanak & Prabha Golia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kanak & Prabha Golia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kanak & Prabha Golia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kanak & Prabha Golia’s filings →

More from the funding graph