Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kamm Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Youth Development$745kInternational$394kEducation$365kReligion$304kArts & Culture$153kFood & Nutrition$93kHuman Services$81kCrime & Legal$80kOther$0
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLYMOUTH CHURCH UCC$57,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$50,000
UWM FOUNDATION$30,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$20,000
URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER$15,000
RADIO MILWAUKEE$2,500
TransCenter for Youth$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $3k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $3k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $2k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $2k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $170k → 17%PATHFINDERS: $40k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 57 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 51 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
18

Total granted

$2.4M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-7%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $305k · revenue +120%
  • PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $210k · revenue +66%
  • THE UWM FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $120k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • SS
    Shorewood Supporters of Excellence in Educational Developmentgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +388%
  • THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -10%
  • CR
    CONVERGENCE RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
UltraViolet Education Fund

Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…

Civil Rights
7
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Goodwill industries of metropolitan chicago, inc. ("goodwill-chicago") is a nonstock, not-for-profit illinois corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock,…

Human Services
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
12
Milwaukee School of Engineering

Milwaukee school of engineering (msoe) is a nonprofit, nonsectarian university providing a balanced education at the undergraduate and graduate level in the disciplines of engineering business, mathematics, and nursing. (see schedule o)…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathfinders Milwaukee Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Shore Library Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
40/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILWAUK: $465,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILWAUKPLYMOUTH CHURCH UCC: $283,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH CHURCH UCCREACH OUT READ: $47,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $47,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,000 · Other+39 more: $391,800 · Other+39 morePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $305,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEA…EVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $22,000 · HealthEVERY MOTHER CO…+1 more: $6,000 · HealthTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDA…WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $80,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BREN…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $42,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSIT…ROOM TO READ: $22,500 · EducationROOM TO READShorewood Supporters of Excellence in Educational Development: $20,000 · EducationShorewood Supp…+5 more: $35,500 · Education+5 morePATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesPATHFINDER…PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $9,500 · Human Services+2 more: $9,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $62,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $17,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $13,000 · Arts & CultureRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTECHNOSERVE INC: $37,000 · InternationalALIGHT: $32,000 · InternationalEARTHENABLE INC: $15,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · InternationalVICTORY GARDEN INITIATIVE INC: $44,600 · EnvironmentURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $31,000 · Environment
Other$1,284,300Health$333,000Education$320,000Human Services$228,500Arts & Culture$140,000International$104,000Environment$75,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $305,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC: $210,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $62,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $47,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetVICTORY GARDEN INITIATIVE INC: $44,600 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOJOURNER FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $22,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNourishMKE Inc: $18,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHENABLE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREDgen Inc: $10,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN: $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetGRAMEEN AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLTREK INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOX POINT BAYSIDE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRADIO MILWAUKEE INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKESHORE STATE PARK: $5,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetSCHOLARMATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDARE2TRI PARATRIATHLON CLUB: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCharity Navigator: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSCENTER FOR YOUTH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE FILM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORY GARDEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds Shorewood Supporters of Excellence in Educational Development ↗
  • Who funds NourishMKE Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHENABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds REDgen Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI26.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Weiss Family Foundation · Gardner Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kamm Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kamm Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kamm Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Kamm Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kamm Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph