· Private foundation
Youth Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LA CAUSA INC | $3,800 |
| HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY | $3,000 |
| BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK | $3,000 |
| SHARP LITERACY | $2,881 |
| MKE URBAN STABLES | $2,500 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY | $2,500 |
| FUTURE URBAN LEADERS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF WISCONSIN | $2,500 |
| CHOSEN INC OF WISCONSIN | $2,000 |
| COPS AND KIDS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE | $2,000 |
| SPINA BIFIDA WISCONSIN | $2,000 |
| MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION | $2,000 |
| MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
140 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WISCONSIN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATI5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +575%- MHMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC7× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +129%
ABOVE THE CLOUDS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +164%
Funded once
- FWFRIENDS WITH FOODone grant, 2023 · $5k
- GOGALS ON THE GO PROJECT INCORPORATED DBA THRIVE TOGETHERone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +1%
- MCMILWAUKEE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +133%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The milwaukee community service corps (mcsc) is a non-profit vocational training organization providing employment, education and life skills to training youth adults and unemployed and underemployed of milwaukee, wisconsin.
Making the arts accessible to all
The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.
The mission of employ milwaukee, inc. is to build a strong workforce development system by planning, coordinating, collaborating and monitoring workforce initiatives with businesses, partners and community stakeholders at the local,…
Wisconsin youth company's mission is to engage youth in opportunities to encourage them to be their best selves.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.
Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…
A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future
Montessori institute teaches and develops programs to montessori instructors to educate them as to montessori teaching methods
Journey house empowers families on milwaukee's near southside to move out of poverty by offering adult education, youth development, workforce readiness, and family engagement.
Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee and the most unlike its peers is Peace Learning Center of Milwaukeeinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
150 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 150 of the 315 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LA CAUSA INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATI ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ABOVE THE CLOUDS INC ↗
- Who funds SHARP LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UPSTREAM ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds WILD SPACE INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds HEAR Wisconsin Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds COPS AND KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATHEDRAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS AT LARGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Hmong American Friendship Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SE WI EMERGENCY SUPPORT GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds CITY ON A HILL INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Core El Centro Incorporated ↗
- Who funds PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds EX FABULA INC ↗
- Who funds BAY VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds AUDIO & BRAILLE LITERACY ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds CHOSEN INC OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD FRIEND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Gardner Foundation · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Jerome J and Dorothy H Holz Family Foundation C/O Donald Tushaus · The Ros Foundation · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Youth Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Youth Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Youth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.