Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kaltenbacher Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$519k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$464kPhilanthropy$285kAnimals$100kEducation$89kReligion$78kArts & Culture$64kYouth Development$43kCrime & Legal$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSKAMP INSTITUTE (PDK)$375,000
SARASOTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE (PDK)$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM (PDK)$25,000
ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION (PDK)$20,000
LINK EDUCATION PARTNERS (GKK)$12,500
ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION (PDK)$5,000
FIRST CONGRETIONAL CHURCH OF W TISBURY (PDK)$5,000
SLN (STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK) (LKR)$5,000
ARTS CONNECTION (ERICA)$5,000
PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE (GKK)$2,700
FAR HILLS MEETING ASSOC (GKK)$1,750
FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER (GKK)$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS (GKK): $1k → 4%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS (GKK): $1k → 4%LIFE CAMP: $500 → 4%LIFE CAMP: $250 → 4%SEEING EYE: $100 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
DE
KS
TN
DC
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$820k · 52 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
57

Total granted

$820k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+26%

Still filing today

35%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $412k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    Animal Rescue Coalition Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +266%
  • MS
    MORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +39%
  • MV
    MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • PA
    PLAN A HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • UH
    UNITED HELP UKRAINE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pg Chambers School and the most unlike its peers is Green Village Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Christian Youth CampsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%58%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,521

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
29/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KFF DONOR ADVISED FUND — $273,174 · OtherKFF DONOR ADVISED FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $55,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST CONGRETIONAL CHURCH OF W TISBURY (PDK) — $55,000 · OtherFIRST CONGRETIONAL CHURCH OF W TISBURY (PDK)ANIMAL RESCUE COALITION (PDK) — $40,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE COALITION (PDK)Individual grant recipient — $27,700 · OtherSARASOTA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE (PDK) — $25,000 · Other+83 more — $240,866 · Other+83 moreThe Roskamp Institute Inc — $375,000 · HealthThe Roskamp Institute Inc+8 more — $16,030 · HealthMORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL — $45,400 · EducationBucknell University — $10,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationSPECTRUM360 — $5,150 · EducationPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC — $3,700 · EducationOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · EducationAnimal Rescue Coalition Inc — $50,000 · AnimalsMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $40,000 · Arts & CulturePaper Mill Playhouse — $1,500 · Arts & CultureARTSCONNECTION INC — $1,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $27,700 · PhilanthropyADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $1,500 · PhilanthropySHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Environment
Other$716,890Health$391,030Education$74,750Animals$50,000Arts & Culture$45,000Philanthropy$34,200Environment$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Roskamp Institute Inc — $375,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAnimal Rescue Coalition Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL — $45,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $27,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLINK EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $15,045 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBucknell University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM360 — $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC — $3,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Women's Health Network — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC — $2,030 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPaper Mill Playhouse — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEAN MICHAEL CLARIZIO CANCER FOUNDATION CHRIS CLARIZIO — $1,300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASOLO THEATRE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH AMERICA GRAND PRIX INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPG CHAMBERS SCHOOL — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CAMP INC — $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Village Fire Department — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADD IMPACT NETWORK INC — $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Roskamp Institute Inc
  • Who funds Animal Rescue Coalition Inc
  • Who funds MORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC
  • Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LINK EDUCATION PARTNERS INC
  • Who funds Bucknell University
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SPECTRUM360
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
  • Who funds PRESCHOOL ADVANTAGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Verizon Foundation · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc · The McJ Amelior Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Vanech Family Foundation · The Fournier Family Foundation · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kaltenbacher Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The Roskamp Institute Inc77% of income from government
  • Paper Mill Playhouse9% of income from government
  • Life Camp Inc4% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs3% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation2% of income from government
  • Bentley University1% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue Coalition Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
  • Morristown-Beard School0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph