Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kalkus Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$137kHealth$107kEducation$96kReligion$39kCivil Rights$21kRecreation & Sports$8kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$189k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,238
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
VAIL HEALTH SERVICES$10,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,250
AMAZING GRACE CHURCH$4,000
ELEVATE USA$2,500
HIDDEN HARVEST$1,500
HARWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,000
KENT DENVER SCHOOL$500
VAIL CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$150
BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION$121
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HIDDEN HARVEST: $2k → 14%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
OH
CA
CO
KY
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$359k · 20 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
16

Total granted

$359k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+37%

Still filing today

70%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KD
    KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +75%
  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $21k · revenue +56%
  • SH
    STANFORD HEALTH CARE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • GS
    GUARDIAN SCHOLARS AT CMU
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MC
    MARRAKESH COUNTRY CLUB CHARITY AUCTION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
2
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
3
Poudre Valley Medical Group Llc

We improve lives. in big ways through learning, healing and discovery. in small, personal ways through human connection. but in all ways, we improve lives.

Health
4
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
5
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
10
Unity Family Healthcare

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Southwestern Vermont Healthcare Foundation Inc

The sole purpose of the svhc foundation shall be to engage in development and fundraising activities exclusively for the support of the southwestern vermont health care corporation and affiliates.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Harwell Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersProfessional Association Ne…Family FoundationsHomeless & Crisis Support S…Higher Education FoundationsAnimal Rescue and Rehabilit…Youth Sports ClubsElementary Charter Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%9%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr12%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr12%65%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
15%
12,260/82,756

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $112,838 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMAZING GRACE CHURCH — $28,500 · OtherAMAZING GRACE CHURCHEISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $26,962 · OtherEISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherGUARDIAN SCHOLARS AT CMU — $10,000 · Other+17 more — $30,561 · Other+17 moreKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $66,604 · EducationKENT DENVER COUNTRY DA…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $9,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES …ELEVATE USA — $3,500 · Education+4 more — $4,650 · Education+4 moreVAIL HEALTH SERVICES — $45,000 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVIC…STANFORD HEALTH CARE — $20,000 · HealthSTANFORD HEALTH CA…+3 more — $3,500 · HealthFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE — $21,000 · Civil RightsDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,600 · PhilanthropyHARWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · PhilanthropyHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HARVEST CORPORATION — $1,500 · Human Services+1 more — $200 · Human ServicesDenver Ballet Guild — $3,250 · Arts & Culture
Other$218,861Education$83,754Health$68,500Civil Rights$21,000Philanthropy$17,600Human Services$6,700Arts & Culture$3,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $66,604 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES — $45,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE — $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $14,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CANCER SURVIVORS DAY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetELEVATE USA — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Ballet Guild — $3,250 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHARWELL FAMILY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetReal Colorado Soccer — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR SPINAL RESTORATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST CORPORATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROWN LEDGE FOUNDATION INC — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TALES RANCH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST RESPONDER THERAPY DOGS — $300 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE PUBLIC SAFETY AWARENESS FOUNDATION — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVail Christian School Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kalkus Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kalkus Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kalkus Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph