Skip to content
Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc

The organization's primary purpose is to educate and raise awareness of the symptoms of ovarian cancer, mobilize survivors of ovarian cancer to champion the cause, raise funds via various charitable events, and to aid finding a cure for ovarian cancer.

$153k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$767kAnimals$10k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$624k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERISTY OF PENNSYLVANIA$50,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$25,000
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WHITEHEAD INSTITUE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $50k → 8%PENN VET WORKING DOG CENTER UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $25k → 16%WOMEN & INFANT HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND: $50k → 14%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $25k → 15%STEVENS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $25k → 19%INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEACH DBA FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER: $10k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $25k → 16%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $25k → 15%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $25k → 19%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75k → 22%JORDAN CENTER FOR GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY: $25k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $12k → 22%MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $10k → 22%MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $10k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 4 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$182k
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+53%

Still filing today

75%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UTMD ANDERSON
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • AG
    ARTHUR G JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL AND RICHARD J SOLOVE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue -122% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • WI
    WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +128%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
3
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
11
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
12
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology; the most unlike its peers is Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INCTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $50,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Educ…THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $50,000 · HealthWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL …MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN…WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI: $50,000 · HealthWOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RIMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $32,000 · HealthMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTERThe Institute For Cancer Research: $10,000 · HealthUTMD ANDERSON: $50,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONARTHUR G JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL AND RICHARD J SOLOVE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50,000 · OtherARTHUR G JAMES C…PENN VET WORKING DOG CENTER UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · OtherPENN VET WORKING…
Education$425,000Health$242,000Other$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHUR G JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL AND RICHARD J SOLOVE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetWOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER: $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: 7% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaleidoscope of Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home