Loading…
· Public charity
KALEIDOSCOPE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC
The organization's primary purpose is to educate and raise awareness of the symptoms of ovarian cancer, mobilize survivors of ovarian cancer to champion the cause, raise funds via various charitable events, and to aid finding a cure for ovarian cancer.
$153k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants
4
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Education$425kHealth$242kOther$110k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
targetingidentifying
2019
detectionearly
2020
grade serous
2021
ccoceffectivetreatment options
2022
determinepatientsccocclinicaleffectivetreatment optionschemotherapy
2023
patientsresponse
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$624k
Total assets
Largest grants
- TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERISTY OF PENNSYLVANIA$50,000
- TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION$50,000
- UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$25,000
- STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 13%. 93% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$432k · 5 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
7
Total granted
$432k
$270k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+37%
+89%
Still filing today
80%
86%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA5× · 2018–2023 · $250k · revenue +37%- UOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +1%
- MCMONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER3× · 2018–2021 · $32k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- WIWHITEHEAD INSTITUE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +71%
WOMEN & INFANT HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLANDone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +23%- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +89%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Philadelphia University
To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.
Education
2
William Penn University
William penn university provides the opportunity for an educational experience with a focus on leadership, technology, and the quaker principles of simplicity, peace-making, intergrity, community and equality.
Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Education
4
Washington University Medical Center
To provide and assist its member organizations in providing hospital facilities, physical properties, and programs appropriate for the care and treatment of patients, for the continued on Schedule O
—
5
Institute for Biomedical Sciences
Research and development with goal of defining a microvascular index for non-invasive monitoring of vascular health and for early diagnosis of vascular related diseases. stem cell differentiation study to optimize selection of scaffolds,…
Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
Health
7
Institute for Systems Biology
Using the science of systems biology to predict, prevent and cure disease.
Science & Tech
8
Pennsylvania College of Health Sciences
The college's mission is to educate for excellence in healthcare practice, leadership, and the continuous acquisition of knowledge.
—
9
Pennington Biomedical Research
The mission of the pennington biomedical research foundation is to support the work of lsu's pennington biomedical research center, which aims to discover the triggers of chronic diseases through innovative reasearch that improves human…
Health
10
Staten Island University Hospital
Staten Island strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay
Health
11
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
To improve the wellness of all people through innovative, interprofessional education of health and biomedical professionals and the discovery and implementation of knowledge.
—
12
Tufts Medical Center Physicians
The tufts medical center physicians organization, inc. coordinates the administrative and billing activities for the group practices in their mission of providing quality health care services to patients of tufts medical center, inc. and…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the most unlike its peers is Monell Chemical Senses Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$425,000Health$242,000Other$110,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds WHITEHEAD INSTITUE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & INFANT HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER ↗
- Who funds STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEACH DBA FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
National Philanthropic TrustPA11.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation KALEIDOSCOPE OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8064 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 311301428 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8064 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 26% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines