Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kakatu Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$212kHuman Services$153kEnvironment$117kRecreation & Sports$116kArts & Culture$114kPhilanthropy$103kHealth$70kHousing & Shelter$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CATALYST$10,000
MSUB$10,000
MSUB$10,000
PRESCOTT COLLEGE KINO BAY CENTER$7,000
BILLINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
REDTAIL LAND CONSERVANCY$6,000
FRIEND OF SONOMA VALLEY LIBRARY$4,500
FISH - SONOMA$4,000
VINTAGE HOUSE$4,000
JACK LONDON PARK PARTNERS$3,500
PROJECT HAWAII INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NATURE IN THE CLASSROOM$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $3k → 9%SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 9%HILLCROFT SERVICES: $16k → 19%HILLCROFT SERVICES: $16k → 19%VINTAGE HOUSE: $4k → 9%HILLCROFT SERVICES: $16k → 19%HILLCROFT SERVICES: $6k → 19%HILLCROFT SERVICES: $5k → 19%VINTAGE HOUSE: $2k → 9%EAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS: $9k → 9%SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 9%HOOLA NA PUA: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
AZ
HI
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Kakatu Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 18% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 11%.

Kakatu Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$868k · 51 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
65

Total granted

$868k
$254k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+19%

Still filing today

43%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HILLCROFT SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $59k · revenue +18%
  • PL
    Pets Lifeline Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +114%
  • TS
    THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FNDTN OF MUNCIE DELAWAR
    one grant, 2020 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hawaii Nature Center Inc

By connecting children and families to nature, hnc builds community, creates meaningful change, and shapes a more sustainable future.

Environment
2
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation

Hawaii island community development corporation was established on july 7, 1986, to provide families with low and moderate income with adequate housing and to acquire, construct and provide housing related activities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Ocean Alliance Project

Protecting and promoting the marine biodiversity of Hawai'i through coral restoration, ecological monitoring, regenerative tourism, and cultural integration

Science & Tech
6
Holani Hana Inc

To reclaim Hawai'i as a beacon of Aloha for the world by activating our four pillars: (1)Pu'uhonua: Create a safe, welcoming, and culturally-rooted space at our site in Papaauhau where individuals, families, organizations, and groups can…

Recreation & Sports
7
Lai Hauola

To preserve the immediate and long-term health and wellbeing of lahaina's diverse communities and precious natural resources.

Food & Nutrition
8
Kipuka Kuleana Inc

The mission of Kipuka Kuleana Inc. is to perpetuate ahupuaa (traditional Hawaiian land division) based natural resource management & connection to place through protection and care of cultural landscapes and family lands. Kipuka Kuleana…

Environment
9
Hawaii Seafood Council

Hawaii seafood council (hsc) supports responsible fisheries and sustainable seafood in hawaii for future generations through consumer education, outreach and research. hsc believes that marine fisheries, fishing and seafood are essential…

Environment
10
Hui Aloha Kiholo

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.

Arts & Culture
11
Protect & Preserve Hawaii Inc

Embracing our kuleana to protect and preserve hawaii's fragile ecosystems through conservation, culture, and community.

Environment
12
Kukio Hoomana Fund

The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward; the most unlike its peers is Robyns Nest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
26/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $83,000 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYHILLCROFT SERVICES: $75,000 · OtherHILLCROFT SERVICESPRESCOTT COLLEGE KINO BAY CENTER: $35,500 · Other+107 more: $715,950 · Other+107 moreHILLCROFT SERVICES INC: $59,000 · Human ServicesHILLCROFT …SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $14,500 · Human ServicesSONOMA COM…ACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesACCESSURF …EAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS: $9,000 · Human ServicesEAGLE MOUN…Becoming Independent: $8,000 · Human ServicesBecoming I…Vintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center: $5,500 · Human Services+2 more: $5,800 · Human ServicesTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $28,250 · EnvironmentRED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $19,000 · EnvironmentSonoma Ecology Center: $17,500 · EnvironmentBILLINGS TRAILNET: $9,000 · EnvironmentVALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Environment+1 more: $2,500 · EnvironmentSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,500 · PhilanthropyALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $9,000 · PhilanthropySonoma Valley Education Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyEagle Mount: $3,000 · PhilanthropyPets Lifeline Inc: $38,000 · AnimalsROBYNS NEST INC: $3,000 · AnimalsKHAN ACADEMY INC: $9,500 · EducationEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $9,000 · EducationMontana State University Billings Foundation & Alumni: $5,000 · EducationSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $11,500 · Arts & CultureSebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNatural History Institute: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$909,450Human Services$115,800Environment$83,250Philanthropy$53,500Animals$41,000Education$23,500Arts & Culture$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLCROFT SERVICES INC: $59,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPets Lifeline Inc: $38,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $28,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $19,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSonoma Ecology Center: $17,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $14,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATALYST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBILLINGS TRAILNET: $9,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $9,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetEAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS: $9,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESIDENTIAL YOUTH SERVICES & EMPOWERMENT: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBecoming Independent: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY TEEN SERVICES: $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center: $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLANIKAI CANOE CLUB: $5,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMontana State University Billings Foundation & Alumni: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSonoma Valley Education Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $3,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBYNS NEST INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEagle Mount: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNatural History Institute: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSUSTAINABLE COASTLINES HAWAI'I: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN MONTANA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS HURT TOO HAWAII: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLong Beach Century Club Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLCROFT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Pets Lifeline Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma Ecology Center ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSURF HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUNCIE INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST INC ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLINGS TRAILNET ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE MOUNT BILLINGS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Simon Blattner Family Foundation · Women Giving as One Inc · McNabb Foundation · Aloha United Way Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Sanderson Family Foundation · The Vadasz Family Foundation · J Watumull Fund · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Vera C Hendry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kakatu Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kakatu Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kakatu Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kakatu Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kakatu’s filings →

    More from the funding graph