· Private foundation
Kairos 610 Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOR COLUMBUS | $210,000 |
| LIFEWISE ACADEMY | $200,000 |
| DESIGN OUTREACH | $192,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP | $165,910 |
| Individual grant recipient | $111,000 |
| KINGS COMM MINISTRIES | $100,000 |
| VINEYARD COLUMBUS | $100,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND URBAN CHURCH PLANTING | $75,000 |
| WATER FOR ISHMAEL | $30,000 |
| PROJECT FORTY | $10,000 |
| COMPANSIONS OF GRACE INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| WELLSPRING | $5,000 |
| AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| ADVANCING GOSPEL FOR ANGOLA | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $583k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LILIFEWISE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $500k · revenue +184%
- FCFOR COLUMBUS3× · 2023–2025 · $460k · revenue +7% · 29% of their budget
- IFInternational Friendships Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $318k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- UNUNDERGROUND NETWORK INCORPORATEDone grant, 2024 · $215k · revenue 0%
- SNSTADIA NEW CHURCH STRATEGIESone grant, 2023 · $50k
- GMGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACHone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to reach the unreached and teach the untaught with the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Missions - sponsors foreign and domestic missions and orphanages with a special emphasis on missions in India
Soul winners india exists to fund christian ministries internationally, with particular emphasis in south asia, the indian subcontinent, and adjacent regions. soul winners india's vision, operations, and perspectives are grounded in the…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Providing responsible evangelism, leadership, development, and humanitarian assistance.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
To share the gospel to unreached people in nations, particularly in india and asia.
ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…
The purpose of IMI is reaching nationals through nationals in ministry.
CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…
To fund national bible workers in impoverished or neglected nations of the 10/40 region of earth. in addition, builiding churches, literacy training, video productions, and community health education.
Spreading the gospel. the staff of igo trains church planting missionaries to carry the gospel to the people of india. igo sends indian evangelists and church planters to reach all ethnic groups.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Kgsa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 19. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗
- Who funds FOR COLUMBUS ↗
- Who funds ADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds DESIGN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds International Friendships Inc ↗
- Who funds UNDERGROUND NETWORK INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MISSION INCREASE ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND URBAN CHURCH PLANTING ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR ISHMAEL ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FORTY INC ↗
- Who funds KINGS COMMISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LIFEWATER INC ↗
- Who funds COMPANIONS OF GRACE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds KGSA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ASSETS TOLEDO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Columbus Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kairos 610 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kairos 610 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kairos 610 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.