Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kainz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$174k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.2MHealth$206kEnvironment$56kAnimals$34kEducation$28kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $174k
$5,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Donor Advised Funds (National Philanthropic Trust)$174,000
NPH USA$5,500
Barrington Youth & Family Services$450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MYCHAL'S LEARNING PLACE: $5k → 14%JOURNEYCARE: $25k → 14%JOURNEYCARE: $2k → 14%Barrington Youth & Family Services: $450 → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $450 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
SD
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 19 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
38

Total granted

$1.4M
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+32%

Still filing today

68%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $66k · revenue +231%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +60%
  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $23k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • AG
    ADVOCATE GOOD SHEPARD HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • HC
    HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CC
    CUBA CARES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
3
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
4
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
5
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
6
Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—
7
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
8
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Group

The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…

—
9
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
10
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
11
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Orphans D/B/a Nph-Usa; the most unlike its peers is Mindful Waste. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED FUNDS (NATIONAL PHILANTROPIC TRUST): $1,027,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISED FUNDS (NATIONAL PHILANTROPIC TRUST)Donor Advised Funds (National Philanthropic Trust): $174,000 · OtherDonor Advised Funds (National Philanthropic Trust)Individual grant recipient: $80,483 · Other+39 more: $250,890 · Other+39 moreJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $66,020 · HealthWINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $2,300 · HealthOPERATION SMILE INC: $40,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $5,500 · InternationalElea Institute: $27,000 · Human ServicesMYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $900 · Human ServicesSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $22,500 · AnimalsANIMAL HOUSE SHELTER INC: $5,000 · AnimalsCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $12,500 · EducationBARRINGTON 220 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,500 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationCristo Rey St Martin College Prep: $2,000 · EducationGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $15,000 · EnvironmentSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD: $7,500 · EnvironmentCITIZENS FOR CONSERVATION INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$1,532,373Health$73,320International$45,500Human Services$32,900Animals$27,500Education$24,000Environment$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC: $66,020 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMindful Waste: $32,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetElea Institute: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEagle Mount: $22,375 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHRIVE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBARRINGTON 220 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HOUSE SHELTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING: $5,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetMYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Health Partnership Clinic: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR CONSERVATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAK PARK-RIVER FOREST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEFFREY PRIDE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mindful Waste ↗
  • Who funds Elea Institute ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Mount ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD ↗
  • Who funds SMART FARM OF BARRINGTON ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON 220 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HOUSE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHSIGHT ↗
  • Who funds WINDHORSE EQUINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Family Health Partnership Clinic ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL22.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Barrington Area Comm Foundation Inc · Yellow-Crowned Foundation · Full Circle Foundation · Foglia Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kainz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kainz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kainz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph